Universidad del valle de México - UVM vs Universidad Mexicana - UNIMEX vs Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia - ENAH vs Universidad Tecnológica de México - UNITEC vs Universidad Anáhuac

Side-by-side comparison from 77 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia - ENAH (4.70)
Universidad del valle de México - UVM: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Mexicana - UNIMEX: wins 0/7 categories
Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia - ENAH: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Tecnológica de México - UNITEC: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 2/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Marketing
Best programme: Global Law
Best programme: History
Best programme: Art and Design
Best programme: Communication
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Category ratings
Facilities
4.15
4.13
3.50
4.33
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.31
4.75
4.50
4.86
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.47
4.48
4.50
4.56
Win
4.41
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
3.60
2.60
3.50
3.78
4.59
Win
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.43
4.15
4.00
4.75
4.63
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
3.87
4.15
5.00
Win
4.00
4.63
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
3.50
2.63
4.00
4.00
4.66
Win
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible education via scholarships
  • +Engaging professors and diverse academic offerings
  • +Extracurricular activities and community involvement
  • +Flexible study schedules and efficient degree completion
  • +Good teaching quality and career-focused outcomes
  • +Adequate study facilities and convenient campus structure
  • +Unique specializations in social sciences and history
  • +Academic excellence and quality professors
  • +Career-focused and demanding programs
  • +Quality teaching and accessible mentors
  • +Flexible study options for working students
  • +Supportive environment and engaging classes
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
Cons
  • -Persistent, intrusive recruitment calls.
  • -Ineffective and overwhelming communication channels.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues create constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world application.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
Rating summary
What students say

Academic strengths emerge clearly, with Professors and Student Life receiving the highest marks. Facilities and Location also score well. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings. Value for money falls in the middle of the spectrum.

This university garners impressive scores in several key areas, particularly excelling in Location (4.75) and Professors (4.475). Student Life and Facilities also receive strong marks. However, significant weaknesses are evident in Accomodation (2.625) and Internationality (2.6), suggesting these aspects may require considerable improvement for prospective students. Overall, the university offers a compelling experience with room for growth.

This institution garners exceptional praise for its value, receiving a perfect score. Professors and location are also significant strengths, both rated highly at 4.5. Student life and accommodation are well-regarded, achieving a solid 4. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and internationality, which both received a rating of 3.5.

This institution received outstanding scores for Location, scoring an impressive 4.86, and Student Life, with a strong 4.75. Professors also garnered high marks at 4.56. Areas for potential improvement include Internationality, which received the lowest rating at 3.78. Facilities, Accommodation, and Value were all rated a solid 4.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 54% of reviews are positive, highlighting good resources and engaging professors. The average rating is 3.71/5, with minimal negative feedback.

With a ~4/5 average rating, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Recurring themes include appreciation for useful academic programs and flexible scheduling. No negative reviews were submitted.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 3 reviews, the university is highly regarded. Positive feedback highlights excellent professors, academic excellence, and unique specializations like Ethnohistory. There is no negative feedback.

Six positive reviews highlight good programs, accessible teachers, and flexible study options. These students appreciated mentor quality and support for those balancing work and study. No negative feedback was provided.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Rating distribution
5★
29%
40%
67%
40%
67%
0%
50%
4★
25%
20%
33%
20%
39%
0%
0%
3★
38%
40%
0%
40%
3%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
Most useful review
Most liked
Acquire the knowledge you need at your pace

The International Business Administration degree at Universidad del Valle de México is an academic journey that will strenghten the skills that you have while traching you diverse ways to apply them to the business world. Accounting, negotiation, finance, marketing, international trade, are just some of the main topics to mention that this degree allows you to deep dive into. Upon graduating, every student will have the required tools and skills to follwo their own professional path.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close