Instituto Tecnológico de Toluca - ITTOLUCA vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad Panamericana vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 60 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Anáhuac (4.60)
Instituto Tecnológico de Toluca - ITTOLUCA: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad Panamericana: wins 1/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Federal University of Petroleum Resources Effurun - Fupre: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Cancun, Mexico
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
33 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication
Aguascalientes, Mexico
4.10
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.50
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.42
Location
Not rated
4.50
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
2.92
Professors
Not rated
4.41
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.46
Internationality
Not rated
4.59
Win
3.33
Not rated
3.00
2.77
Student life
Not rated
4.63
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.31
Value
Not rated
4.63
Win
4.33
Not rated
3.00
3.54
Accommodation
Not rated
4.66
Win
3.75
Not rated
4.00
2.46
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities
  • +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
  • +Strong business programs and professional connections
  • +Personalized attention and strong sense of community

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Relevant curriculum & career preparation
  • +Growth opportunities & networking
  • +Improved facilities & industry readiness
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
  • -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
  • -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
  • -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Poorly structured learning environments hinder accessibility.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution presents a mixed but generally positive profile. The strongest areas include **Value** and **Professors**, both scoring above 3.4. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also received respectable scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest point, significantly lagging behind other categories, with **Location** and **Internationality** also receiving lower marks.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Most students find the university enriching, highlighting growth opportunities and industry readiness, with updated curricula and facilities. A small portion mentioned structural issues for large lectures. The average rating is 3.85/5.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
67%
33%
0%
50%
31%
4★
0%
39%
58%
0%
0%
31%
3★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
31%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
1★
0%
0%
8%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

My Overall Experience

If i'm being honest, Fupre was great i mean is awkward to say Uni was "great" but i got in without actually knowing what to do and how to go about it but getting there and actually trying to study hard and make good friends made the whole journey "great"

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close