LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Pancasila University vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI vs Jakarta State University vs Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Gayus Lumbuun
Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
- +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
- +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
- +Engaging and diverse teaching methods
- +Inspiring and practical learning experiences
- +Supportive and inspiring lecturers
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Diverse range of programs and majors
- +Good course material and practical applications
- +High-quality, career-ready graduates.
- +Comprehensive, innovative, and practical academic programs.
- +Excellent facilities and pleasant learning environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Strong practical and theoretical business and economics programs
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Real-world application and industry relevance
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
- -Frequent administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.
With an excellent overall profile, the university shines particularly brightly in its **location and student life**, both receiving perfect and near-perfect scores respectively. Professors and accommodation also garnered strong marks. While the **internationality** rating is a moderate 3.5, indicating room for growth, the overall experience is highly positive, reflected in the consistent 4-4.5 star ratings across most aspects.
Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength, with perfect scores for both its professors and location. Students also report highly positive experiences with student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The facilities receive a solid rating, representing the only area below a 4.5, yet still indicating a strong overall offering.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, particularly excelling in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving 4.5 stars. **Value** also scores highly at 4.5. Its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are all consistently rated at a solid 4 stars, indicating well-rounded strengths. No specific areas were rated below 4 stars.
All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.
Both reviews are positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight inspiring teaching methods, hybrid learning, and engaging lecturers. No negative feedback was provided.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.
With an average rating of 4.67/5, the three reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight the university's role in preparing graduates for the workforce, comprehensive culinary arts curriculum, and good campus facilities and accessibility.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Based on two reviews with an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students highlight enriching educational experiences, well-designed curricula blending theory with practical application, and knowledgeable, invested faculty.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show