LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Universitas Terbuka - UT vs Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ vs Universitas Trilogi vs Krida Wacana Christian University

Side-by-side comparison from 25 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universitas MH Thamrin (5.00)
LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR: wins 2/6 categories
Universitas Terbuka - UT: wins 1/6 categories
Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ: wins 0/6 categories
Universitas Trilogi: wins 0/6 categories
Krida Wacana Christian University: wins 1/6 categories
Universitas MH Thamrin: wins 2/6 categories
Universitas Mercu Buana: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Hospital and Healthcare Management
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
4.28
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.75
Win
4.59
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.75
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.75
Win
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Value
4.50
4.39
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.13
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
  • +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
  • +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
  • +Flexible and accessible distance learning for working professionals.
  • +Well-structured academic programs with good quality materials.
  • +Supportive faculty and organized learning environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Relevant programs and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical learning and industry partnerships
  • +Dynamic and critical idea exchange

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
  • -Lack of effective communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder practical learning.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from faculty and administration.
  • -Lack of career support and relevant industry connections.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.

With an exceptional score of 4.59, the university's **location** stands out as its strongest attribute. Other well-regarded areas include **facilities** (4.28) and **value** (4.39). The **accommodation** score, at 4.13, is slightly lower in comparison but still reflects a positive reception across most surveyed aspects of student experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university garners excellent scores in several key areas. Notably, its **Professors** and **Accomodation** received perfect marks, indicating exceptional quality in teaching and living arrangements. **Student Life** and **Value** also scored very highly, suggesting a vibrant campus experience and good return on investment. The university's **Facilities** and **Location** are also well-regarded. The lowest rating was for **Internationality**, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.

With a 4.5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students praise flexibility for working professionals and accessible, well-organized materials. ~94% of feedback is positive.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a great and relevant campus with diverse programs, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent resources. Practical learning and industry partnerships are appreciated.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
56%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
50%
39%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
6%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close