LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Universitas Terbuka - UT vs Gunadarma University vs Tanri Abeng University - TAU vs Universitas Trilogi

Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama (5.00)
LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR: wins 2/5 categories
Universitas Terbuka - UT: wins 1/5 categories
Gunadarma University: wins 1/5 categories
Tanri Abeng University - TAU: wins 0/5 categories
Universitas Trilogi: wins 0/5 categories
Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama: wins 1/5 categories
University of Bunda Mulia - UBM: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
4.28
Win
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Location
4.75
4.59
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.75
Win
4.17
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.75
Win
4.17
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.17
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.50
4.39
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.13
4.17
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
  • +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
  • +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
  • +Flexible and accessible distance learning for working professionals.
  • +Well-structured academic programs with good quality materials.
  • +Supportive faculty and organized learning environment.
  • +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
  • +Good facilities and helpful tutors
  • +Strong programs with skilled lecturers

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Interactive and comprehensible learning environment.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
  • -Lack of effective communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administrative and management processes cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from instructors and the institution is a persistent problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.

With an exceptional score of 4.59, the university's **location** stands out as its strongest attribute. Other well-regarded areas include **facilities** (4.28) and **value** (4.39). The **accommodation** score, at 4.13, is slightly lower in comparison but still reflects a positive reception across most surveyed aspects of student experience.

Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its location is exceptionally rated at 5, and student life and professors both score well with a 4. Areas for improvement are facilities and accommodation, each receiving a 3, which represent the weakest aspects of the university's offering. Internationality also sits at a moderate 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.

With a 4.5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students praise flexibility for working professionals and accessible, well-organized materials. ~94% of feedback is positive.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight an eventful and immersive learning experience, with interactive and easy-to-comprehend lectures. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
56%
50%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
50%
39%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close