East Delta University - EDU vs Government Hazi Mohammad Mohsin College vs Bangladesh Navy School and College, Chittagong vs University of Science and Technology Chittagong vs Government City College Chattogram - GCC

Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: East Delta University - EDU (4.30)
East Delta University - EDU: wins 2/6 categories
Government Hazi Mohammad Mohsin College: wins 0/6 categories
Bangladesh Navy School and College, Chittagong: wins 0/6 categories
University of Science and Technology Chittagong: wins 4/6 categories
Government City College Chattogram - GCC: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Chittagong, Bangladesh
4.30
Top
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Business
Best programme: Electronics and Communication Engineering
Best programme: Biochemistry and Biotechnology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.67
Win
3.67
3.50
4.00
2.00
Location
4.00
5.00
3.00
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.83
4.33
3.50
5.00
Win
3.00
Internationality
4.67
Win
2.00
3.00
4.00
1.00
Student life
4.50
4.33
3.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Value
4.50
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Accommodation
4.00
4.33
3.00
5.00
Win
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Beautiful campus with numerous amenities
  • +Skill development and confidence building
  • +Reputed and historic college with a disciplined academic environment
  • +Experienced and supportive teachers dedicated to academic standards
  • +Peaceful campus conducive to study with co-curricular opportunities
  • +Supportive teachers and engaging college environment
  • +Solid academics
  • +Lack of personal autonomy and restrictive rules
  • +hands-on learning opportunities
  • +qualified instructors
  • +strong science and medical programmes

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are significant issues.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and lack of clear communication cause frustration.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as unengaging and not relevant to real-world applications.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistent problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of academic support are recurring complaints.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and poor management hinder academic progress.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources create a challenging learning environment.
  • -Inflexible policies and a perceived lack of student support negatively impact the overall experience.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university garners exceptional marks for its **professors**, achieving a near-perfect score. Facilities and internationality also score highly, reflecting a strong overall academic and global environment. Areas with moderate scores include student life and value. The lowest ratings were observed in location and accommodation, suggesting these aspects could be areas for improvement.

This university receives excellent scores for its location (5/5), student life (4.33), accommodation (4.33), and professors (4.33). Facilities are rated moderately well at 3.67, and value is strong at 4. The weakest area is internationality, scoring only 2. Overall, it excels in student experience and amenities, but has room for improvement in fostering a global environment.

This institution exhibits a commendable balance in its overall evaluation, with its strongest area being **Value**, earning a high rating of 4. Conversely, **Location**, **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, and **Internationality** represent the areas with the lowest scores, all receiving a rating of 3. **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated moderately at 3.5.

Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, particularly in its professors, location, student life, accommodation, and perceived value, all receiving perfect scores. Facilities and internationality are also highly rated, scoring a 4. The university presents a very strong overall profile, with no significant weak areas identified.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.33/5 from 6 reviews, ~67% of feedback is positive. Students praise the transformative BBA program, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent campus amenities like shuttle services and active clubs. There is a minor suggestion for increased research opportunities.

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Approximately 100% of reviews are favorable, highlighting a well-renowned institute with a disciplined, supportive academic and peaceful campus environment suitable for study.

The two university student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4 out of 5 stars. Feedback highlights enjoyable on-campus experiences and supportive teachers, alongside concerns about restrictive campus environments and a lack of personal freedom.

This university garners a highly positive reception (~100% positive reviews) with an average rating of 4/5. Students praise excellent learning experiences in physical sciences and medicine, facilitated by qualified instructors and research hospital access.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
67%
33%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
33%
100%
100%
0%
3★
33%
33%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close