St. Paul's University - SPU vs Meru University of Science and Technology vs Railways Training Institute - RTI vs Kenya Technical Trainers College - KTTC vs Africa Nazarene University

Side-by-side comparison from 45 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Kenya Technical Trainers College - KTTC (5.00)
St. Paul's University - SPU: wins 0/7 categories
Meru University of Science and Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Railways Training Institute - RTI: wins 0/7 categories
Kenya Technical Trainers College - KTTC: wins 7/7 categories
Africa Nazarene University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration and Operations Management
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Architectural Engineering
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
4.63
4.17
4.00
5.00
Win
4.67
Location
4.60
4.09
4.67
5.00
Win
4.00
Professors
4.50
4.00
4.33
5.00
Win
4.33
Internationality
4.27
3.33
3.67
5.00
Win
4.67
Student life
4.71
4.00
4.33
5.00
Win
4.67
Value
4.73
4.25
4.00
5.00
Win
4.67
Accommodation
4.58
4.08
4.00
5.00
Win
4.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive, approachable, and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Peaceful, positive learning environment and personal growth focus
  • +Quality education and strong academic performance leading to career success
  • +Modern, practical learning facilities and equipment
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable lecturers
  • +Emphasis on academic excellence and student well-being
  • +Practical, engaging learning with immediately applicable skills.
  • +Unique, specialized programs in niche fields.
  • +Quality campus facilities and resources.
  • +Passionate and knowledgeable professors
  • +Extensive student support and resources
  • +Engaging learning environment
  • +Diverse programs, mission-driven academics, and faculty expertise.
  • +Ethical development and Christian values integration.
  • +Culturally rich environment and international exposure.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Ineffective teaching and poor curriculum design are disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in curriculum is disappointing.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates excellent performance in student life, achieving a high rating of 4.71. Value for money and facilities also scored very well, at 4.73 and 4.63 respectively. Internationality stands out as the area with the lowest score, at 4.27, suggesting room for growth in this aspect. Overall, the institution presents a strong offering with a particularly vibrant student experience.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas. The highest marks are for Value, closely followed by Facilities. Student Life and Accomodation also receive solid ratings. However, Internationality stands out as the weakest aspect, scoring considerably lower than other categories. The university's Location and Professors are rated well.

The institution receives very positive evaluations, with its location standing out as the strongest area. Professors and student life also earned high marks. Areas for improvement include internationality, which received the lowest score. Facilities, accommodation, and value were rated solidly in the middle.

With perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in every surveyed area. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received top marks. There are no weak areas identified, indicating a consistently outstanding university experience and offering.

This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas, notably in facilities, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all scoring an impressive 4.67. Professors also earned a strong rating of 4.33. Location is the sole category with a slightly lower score, receiving a 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.54/5 average rating and ~0% negative feedback across 26 reviews, students praise St. Paul's University's supportive lecturers, practical courses, and peaceful learning environment, fostering personal and professional growth.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~92% rating it 4-5 stars and an average of 4.5/5. Students praise academic excellence, practical preparation, modern facilities, and approachable lecturers. No negative feedback was provided.

All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight practical modules, engaging lecturers, and valuable skills gained from their learning experiences. The university's unique rail and road courses and central Nairobi location were also appreciated.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight knowledgeable professors and a rich array of resources for success, including excellent library, labs, and strong support services.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, reviews highlight strong program diversity, mission-driven academics, and a vibrant campus with international exposure. Students also appreciate the ethical and moral development offered, though one mentions the university is expensive.

Rating distribution
5★
54%
58%
67%
100%
67%
4★
46%
33%
33%
0%
33%
3★
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close