St. Paul's University - SPU vs Karatina University - Karu vs Railways Training Institute - RTI vs Kenya Technical Trainers College - KTTC vs Kenya Institute of Mass Communication - KIMC

Side-by-side comparison from 48 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Kenya Technical Trainers College - KTTC (5.00)
St. Paul's University - SPU: wins 0/2 categories
Karatina University - Karu: wins 0/2 categories
Railways Training Institute - RTI: wins 0/2 categories
Kenya Technical Trainers College - KTTC: wins 2/2 categories
Kenya Institute of Mass Communication - KIMC: wins 0/2 categories
Kaimosi Friends University - KAFU : wins 0/2 categories
Amref International University - AMIU: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration and Operations Management
Best programme: Agricultural Science
Best programme: Architectural Engineering
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Best programme: Bsc Information Technology
Best programme: Community Health and Epidemiology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.63
4.00
4.00
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.00
Location
4.60
4.08
4.67
5.00
5.00
3.00
4.00
Professors
4.50
4.50
4.33
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.00
Internationality
4.27
4.00
3.67
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.00
Student life
4.71
4.15
4.33
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
4.00
Value
4.73
4.29
4.00
5.00
Win
4.50
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.58
4.23
4.00
5.00
3.50
5.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive, approachable, and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Peaceful, positive learning environment and personal growth focus
  • +Quality education and strong academic performance leading to career success
  • +Passionate, supportive, and professional lecturers.
  • +Engaging academic programs and personal development.
  • +Vibrant campus life and welcoming community.
  • +Practical, engaging learning with immediately applicable skills.
  • +Unique, specialized programs in niche fields.
  • +Quality campus facilities and resources.
  • +Passionate and knowledgeable professors
  • +Extensive student support and resources
  • +Engaging learning environment
  • +Practical skills development for career readiness
  • +Personal and talent growth opportunities
  • +Strong IT and technology programs
  • +Knowledgeable professors and good facilities
  • +Interest in career and industry preparation
  • +Inclusivity and health focus
  • +Skill development for decision-making
  • +Lasting opportunities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment detract from the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support create a sense of neglect.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in curriculum is disappointing.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are major drawbacks.
  • -Inconsistent and ineffective teaching quality is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment
  • -Lack of support and resources
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates excellent performance in student life, achieving a high rating of 4.71. Value for money and facilities also scored very well, at 4.73 and 4.63 respectively. Internationality stands out as the area with the lowest score, at 4.27, suggesting room for growth in this aspect. Overall, the institution presents a strong offering with a particularly vibrant student experience.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across multiple aspects. The strongest area appears to be **Value**, receiving the highest score. **Professors** and **Accomodation** also score very well. The weakest area, while still positive, is **Facilities**, which received the lowest score among the surveyed categories. The university presents a generally favorable profile with a clear standout in terms of its perceived value.

The institution receives very positive evaluations, with its location standing out as the strongest area. Professors and student life also earned high marks. Areas for improvement include internationality, which received the lowest score. Facilities, accommodation, and value were rated solidly in the middle.

With perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in every surveyed area. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received top marks. There are no weak areas identified, indicating a consistently outstanding university experience and offering.

This university garners excellent scores for its location, achieving a perfect 5. Its facilities and professors also stand out with strong 4-star ratings, complemented by a solid 4.5 for value. Areas for development include student life and accommodation, both scoring a respectable 3 to 3.5 stars. Internationality also received a positive 4-star rating.

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its **facilities, professors, and accommodation**. Student life and overall value are also strong at 4 out of 5. Conversely, the **location** received the lowest rating, scoring a 3. Internationality is another area of strength, also rated at 5.

This university garners consistently high marks across all assessed aspects. Its strengths are evident in uniformly excellent ratings for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all scoring a solid 4 out of 5. No single area stands out as significantly weaker than the others, suggesting a well-rounded and satisfactory experience for students in every key domain.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.54/5 average rating and ~0% negative feedback across 26 reviews, students praise St. Paul's University's supportive lecturers, practical courses, and peaceful learning environment, fostering personal and professional growth.

With a ~86% positive sentiment (12 of 14 reviews), students praise knowledgeable professors, engaging classes, vibrant campus life, and a strong sense of community. A few noted areas for facility improvement.

All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight practical modules, engaging lecturers, and valuable skills gained from their learning experiences. The university's unique rail and road courses and central Nairobi location were also appreciated.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight knowledgeable professors and a rich array of resources for success, including excellent library, labs, and strong support services.

With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, students highlight strong practical skill development and opportunities to foster personal talents. No negative comments were received.

This university receives strong positive feedback, with approximately 100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight the IT program's solid foundation, knowledgeable professors, and well-equipped labs.

With a 4/5 average rating, this university has received overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight opportunities for growth and skill development, particularly in healthcare decision-making, and praise initiatives for inclusivity and health in Africa. No negative feedback was reported.

Rating distribution
5★
54%
36%
67%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
46%
50%
33%
0%
100%
100%
100%
3★
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close