DMI St John the Baptist University - DMISJBU vs Institute of Technology, University of Kashmir - IOT ZAKURA CAMPUS vs National University - NU vs Pentecostal Life University vs Catholic University of Malawi

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
DMI St John the Baptist University - DMISJBU: wins 1/5 categories
Institute of Technology, University of Kashmir - IOT ZAKURA CAMPUS: wins 1/5 categories
National University - NU: wins 0/5 categories
Pentecostal Life University: wins 0/5 categories
Catholic University of Malawi: wins 0/5 categories
Malawi School of Government: wins 0/5 categories
Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources: wins 3/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Manila, Philippines
4.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Agricultural Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
3.86
3.00
3.33
Not rated
2.00
4.00
4.25
Win
Location
3.86
5.00
4.00
Not rated
1.00
5.00
4.25
Professors
3.71
4.00
3.67
Not rated
3.00
3.00
4.60
Win
Internationality
3.86
Win
2.67
3.67
Not rated
2.00
3.00
3.80
Student life
3.71
3.50
4.00
Not rated
3.00
3.00
4.00
Value
3.71
3.67
4.33
Not rated
3.00
4.00
4.60
Win
Accommodation
3.57
4.00
Win
2.67
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.20
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Quality teaching and dedicated, hardworking lecturers.
  • +Good facilities, well-equipped library, classrooms, and laboratories.
  • +Strong, well-structured academic programs and extracurricular activities.
  • +Extensive facilities and activities
  • +Focus on practical skills and experience
  • +Access to advanced labs and equipment
  • +High-quality education and supportive professors
  • +Financial aid options and focus on student well-being
  • +Academic and extracurricular support

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Affordable and accessible international education
  • +Relevant and impactful programs (e.g., economics, agriculture, development)
  • +Supportive professors and leadership development opportunities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unsupportive instructors are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of student support are major concerns.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a major concern.
  • -The curriculum is often described as unengaging and irrelevant.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution receives a solid academic and lifestyle assessment. Facilities, location, and internationality stand out with the highest scores, all around 3.86. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest rating at approximately 3.57. Areas like professors, student life, and value maintain respectable scores in the mid-to-high 3.7 range.

This institution shines in its **location**, receiving a perfect score. **Professors** and **accommodation** are also strong points, both rated at a solid 4. Student life and facilities are adequately rated at 3 and 3.5 respectively, while **internationality** is the lowest-scoring area at 2.67. The university offers a good **value** for students, averaging 3.67.

This university presents a mixed but generally positive picture. It excels in **Value**, receiving the highest rating, and also scores very well for **Location** and **Student Life**. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as its weakest area. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** are solid, while **Facilities** fall in the middle range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic offerings, with professors receiving a high rating of 4.6. Facilities and location are also well-regarded at 4.25. Student life scores a solid 4. However, accommodation presents the weakest area, rated at 3.2. Internationality stands at 3.8, and value for money is also excellent at 4.6.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 7 reviews are positive, averaging 4.43/5 stars. Students praise qualified lecturers, well-equipped facilities, and supportive learning environments. Some mention a need for updated technology resources.

With one positive review out of three total, this university offers good facilities and activities but may lack practical skill exposure. The average rating is 3.33/5, with minimal negative feedback.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight quality education, supportive professors, and available scholarships. A minor point (~33%) noted issues with student accommodation during enrollment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.4/5 from five reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise affordable tuition, well-organized lectures, good administration, and relevant programs in economics and agriculture. Some suggest improving accommodations and research grants.

Rating distribution
5★
43%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
60%
4★
57%
33%
33%
0%
0%
0%
20%
3★
0%
67%
33%
0%
100%
100%
20%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close