Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina vs Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP vs Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC vs Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO vs Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL

Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina: wins 3/7 categories
Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 3/7 categories
Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administracion - CESA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Science (Recreation and Sports Management)
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Graphic Engineering and Design
Category ratings
Facilities
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.20
4.00
2.33
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.40
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.67
Not rated
4.60
5.00
Win
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.67
Not rated
3.20
5.00
Win
2.33
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
2.67
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.33
Not rated
4.40
Win
4.00
2.67
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.67
Not rated
3.60
4.00
Win
2.33
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Quality programs and affordable tuition
  • +Practical experience and real-world application
  • +Career advancement opportunities and international agreements

Nothing to show

  • +Strong economics, law, and political science programs
  • +Excellent preparation for the labor market
  • +University prestige and history
  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.
  • +quality faculty and student programs
  • +good location

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates confusion.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of effective communication and student support is a problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

The university receives exceptionally strong feedback in several key areas, with facilities, professors, location, and student life all earning near-perfect scores. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present as comparatively weaker aspects, scoring notably lower. The value for money is also rated favorably, though not as highly as the top-tier categories.

Nothing to show

Professors receive the highest marks, reflecting a strong academic core. Facilities and value also score well, indicating a positive learning environment and good return on investment. However, location and internationality present opportunities for improvement, with lower scores in these areas. Student life and accommodation fall within the middle range of ratings.

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

Academically, the university excels, with professors receiving an exceptionally high rating of 4.33. However, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a low 2.33. Student life and value for money are also mid-range, while location sits at a neutral 3. The university's internationality also scored similarly low at 2.33.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All reviews are positive (100%), highlighting quality study programs, affordability, and enriching experiences. Students appreciate transformative programs, skilled teachers, and practical application opportunities. The university also fosters business sector support and international specialization agreements.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students praise rigorous economics and law programs, excellent professional preparation, and the university's prestige. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

With an average rating of 3.67/5, reviews indicate positive aspects like good teachers and program offerings. A minor point concerns the availability of study and sports spaces, and outdated computer equipment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
0%
83%
100%
33%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
17%
0%
67%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close