Escuela de Administración de Negocios - EAN vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - UPN vs Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL vs Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz

Side-by-side comparison from 10 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Escuela de Administración de Negocios - EAN: wins 1/2 categories
Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - UPN: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL: wins 1/2 categories
Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz: wins 0/2 categories
Fundación Universidad de América: wins 0/2 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Modern Languages with Business
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: Mathematics
Best programme: Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
4.00
1.00
Not rated
Location
5.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
5.00
1.00
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
4.00
1.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
4.00
3.00
3.00
1.00
Not rated
Student life
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
4.00
1.00
Not rated
Value
4.50
Not rated
4.00
5.00
5.00
1.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
1.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong focus on entrepreneurship integrated across programs.
  • +Diverse language options and specialized career paths within Modern Languages.
  • +High-quality teaching, student well-being, and administrative improvements.
  • +Relevant programs leading to career success
  • +Contribution to economic growth
  • +Excellent teaching quality and teacher attentiveness
  • +High-quality education provided by the institution
  • +Diverse faculties and engaging university activities
  • +Strong analytical and technical skills, especially in mathematics and data
  • +Passion for learning and pursuing advanced studies
  • +Practical, relevant assignments and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Strong psychology program.
  • +Supportive and high-quality teaching
  • +Ample green campus spaces

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are also significant drawbacks.
  • -Inflexible curriculum and teaching methods are a recurring point of dissatisfaction.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
  • -Lack of responsiveness to student concerns is a recurring problem.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Disorganized and inefficient administrative processes.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of transparency and communication causes dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of focus on professional development.
  • -Poor administrative and management practices.
  • -Limited international opportunities and low university ranking.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent marks, with professors and location standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a perfect score. Student life and value also score highly, indicating a positive overall experience. Facilities and accommodation are rated well, while internationality is a solid but comparatively lower-scoring aspect.

This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.

Offering a truly standout experience, this university excels in its **Accomodation**, achieving a perfect score. Its **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** are also strong points, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. The university's **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** are rated competently at 3, indicating areas for potential development alongside its already impressive strengths.

This institution earns excellent scores in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and accommodation all received perfect marks, indicating a strong foundation. Student life and internationality are areas for potential growth, with both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture, particularly in its core offerings and infrastructure.

With excellent scores in accommodation and location, this institution shines. Its facilities, professors, and student life also received positive marks. However, its internationality received a more moderate rating, representing the weakest area. Overall, the university offers strong value.

This institution demonstrates exceptional performance across all surveyed categories, receiving a perfect score of 1 in every aspect. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as the university excels uniformly in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This indicates a remarkably consistent and high-achieving environment.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, ~100% of student feedback is positive. Recurring themes highlight the university's focus on sustainable entrepreneurship, diverse language options within programs like Modern Languages, and quality teaching.

With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.

The single review expresses strong satisfaction, particularly praising the excellent teaching approach and thoroughness of instructors. This positive feedback represents 100% of the feedback, with an average rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

With an average rating of 5/5, university student reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Feedback highlights strong mathematical interests and analytical skills, alongside participation in research and academic events. The university offers diverse faculties and engaging activities.

With one review averaging 4/5 stars, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight great professors and practical assignments, though infrastructure issues were noted.

With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are split evenly, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight green spaces and satisfactory teaching quality. Negative reviews criticize obsolete curriculum, focus on money, and lack of international agreements or research promotion.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
50%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
My opinion on Ean University

Ean University is one of the most socially diverse institutions you can find in Bogotá. Its guiding principle is "Sustainable Entrepreneurship"—a philosophy deeply embedded in the curriculum. Regardless of their major, every student is required to engage with this concept at some point in their academic journey. I am currently enrolled in the Modern Languages program, which offers a strong foundation in Spanish and English, along with the option to study additional foreign languages such as German, French, Italian, or Portuguese. The program also allows students to choose from three different areas of emphasis: translation skills, digital communication, or organizational communication. I genuinely enjoy studying at Ean University. It equips students with essential tools for entering the labor market. Even as a student in the Faculty of Humanities, I am required to learn about business and economic strategies—something I find particularly valuable for those who aspire to go beyond language learning and theoretical knowledge. Another aspect I appreciate is how the university supports students in developing their start-up ideas, regardless of whether those ventures are currently successful or still in the early stages. Although the campus is relatively small, it is well-equipped. The classrooms are spacious and offer a variety of useful resources. There are also several social spaces for students to enjoy, including a nap room, a game room, limited green areas, and more. Additionally, the university is located in one of the best areas of the city, surrounded by restaurants, shopping malls, and countless activities—making student life both convenient and vibrant. In my experience, the professors have been excellent—knowledgeable, respectful, and supportive. However, I’m aware that some of my peers have had less positive interactions. That said, not everything has been perfect. The course registration process can vary between being highly efficient and extremely chaotic. I’ve had instances where I had to argue with administrative staff just to complete a simple request, which often took a long time to resolve. Additionally, many students (though not myself) have raised concerns about the curriculum including courses that don’t seem essential to our field—such as statistics, multiple entrepreneurship classes, and geopolitical studies. Overall, my experience at Ean University has been very positive, though there is definitely room for improvement, particularly in administrative processes.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The worst experience

Do not study here, there are other better universities. The pensum are obsolete. The university is only interested in money. There are no international agreements, they do not have a good ranking, they do not promote research or culture of professional development

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close