University of Tunis El Manar vs Universite Centrale - UC vs Esprit school of business vs Misr University for Science and Technology vs South Mediterranean University - Smu

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Esprit school of business (5.00)
University of Tunis El Manar: wins 0/7 categories
Universite Centrale - UC: wins 0/7 categories
Esprit school of business: wins 3/7 categories
Misr University for Science and Technology: wins 2/7 categories
South Mediterranean University - Smu: wins 2/7 categories
Manouba University: wins 0/7 categories
Higher Institute of Technological Studies of Rades - ISET RADES: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Computer Information Systems
Best programme: Bachelor Business
Tunis, Tunisia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
2.83
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.22
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.33
Not rated
4.00
3.50
4.14
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.67
Not rated
4.33
4.50
Win
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
2.50
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.00
3.78
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.50
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.50
4.13
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.67
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.00
4.56
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
Not rated
3.67
4.00
Win
3.14
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic foundation and challenging programs
  • +Outstanding professors and valuable support
  • +Vibrant student life and extracurricular opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Innovative and relevant curriculum
  • +Welcoming and good staff
  • +Strong business and engineering programs
  • +Supportive and understanding professors
  • +Innovative learning environment and future-ready skills
  • +Modern facilities and effective teaching methods
  • +Comprehensive programs with technical and business skills
  • +Supportive and approachable professors
  • +Vibrant campus life and personal growth opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Ineffective systems and a lack of educational structure are noted.
  • -Subpar or outdated materials are a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are common complaints.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often perceived as inadequate.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a major drawback.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its professors and value for money, both receiving high marks. Student life also garners a positive rating. Conversely, the university's facilities and internationality are areas that received lower scores, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. Accommodations and location fall within a moderate range of feedback.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, internationality, and value, all receiving scores around 4.67. Professors are also highly rated at 4.33. Facilities and location are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, with a score of 3.67.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff and vibrant student life, both earning a high 4.5 rating. Facilities and accommodation also score well at 4, as does its international appeal and overall value. The university's location receives the lowest mark at 3.5, representing its primary area for potential improvement.

This institution scores particularly well for **Value** (4.56), followed closely by **Professors** (4.33) and **Facilities** (4.22). Areas receiving more moderate assessments include **Location** (4.14), **Student Life** (4.13), and **Internationality** (3.78). The lowest-rated aspect is **Accomodation**, scoring 3.14.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews indicate a strong academic foundation and vibrant student life for ~74% of students. Professors are highly regarded, and programs show good job market alignment. A small portion of feedback (~17%) criticizes poor management and a lack of structure.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight innovative content, practical projects, and welcoming staff.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 2 positive reviews highlight faculty support and innovative programs. No negative reviews were submitted.

All 9 reviews are positive, averaging 4.67/5. Students highlight a well-rounded curriculum with both technical and non-technical courses, vibrant campus life, and supportive professors. There is no negative feedback in this sample.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
0%
100%
50%
67%
0%
0%
4★
33%
0%
0%
50%
33%
0%
0%
3★
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
terrible

I've never seen such incompetence anywhere else. management is terrible system doesn't live up to expectations education in most institutions completely lacks structure cheap material that doesn't work

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close