University of Tunis El Manar vs Universite Centrale - UC vs Esprit school of business vs Institut Supérieur des langues de Tunis - ISLT vs Misr University for Science and Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Esprit school of business (5.00)
University of Tunis El Manar: wins 0/6 categories
Universite Centrale - UC: wins 0/6 categories
Esprit school of business: wins 2/6 categories
Institut Supérieur des langues de Tunis - ISLT: wins 2/6 categories
Misr University for Science and Technology: wins 1/6 categories
South Mediterranean University - Smu: wins 1/6 categories
Higher Institute of Technological Studies of Rades - ISET RADES: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Bachelor of Computer Information Systems
Best programme: Bachelor Business
Category ratings
Facilities
2.83
Not rated
4.00
2.00
4.00
4.14
Win
Not rated
Location
3.33
Not rated
4.00
2.00
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Professors
3.67
Not rated
4.33
5.00
Win
4.50
4.29
Not rated
Internationality
2.50
Not rated
4.67
Win
3.00
4.00
3.71
Not rated
Student life
3.50
Not rated
4.67
Win
3.00
4.50
4.29
Not rated
Value
3.67
Not rated
4.67
5.00
Win
4.00
4.43
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
Not rated
3.67
3.00
4.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic foundation and challenging programs
  • +Outstanding professors and valuable support
  • +Vibrant student life and extracurricular opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Innovative and relevant curriculum
  • +Welcoming and good staff
  • +Strong business and engineering programs
  • +Practical teaching methods and effective professors
  • +Opportunities for leadership and campus involvement
  • +Supportive and understanding professors
  • +Innovative learning environment and future-ready skills
  • +Modern facilities and effective teaching methods
  • +Strong theoretical and practical business programs
  • +Supportive and approachable professors
  • +Personal and academic growth opportunities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Ineffective systems and a lack of educational structure are noted.
  • -Subpar or outdated materials are a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are common complaints.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often perceived as inadequate.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Poor communication and disorganization from administration.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and limited course options.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a major drawback.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently mentioned.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication cause frustration.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as rigid and not well-suited to modern needs.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its professors and value for money, both receiving high marks. Student life also garners a positive rating. Conversely, the university's facilities and internationality are areas that received lower scores, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. Accommodations and location fall within a moderate range of feedback.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, internationality, and value, all receiving scores around 4.67. Professors are also highly rated at 4.33. Facilities and location are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, with a score of 3.67.

Performance across key university metrics reveals distinct strengths and weaknesses. The institution excels in attracting high-quality faculty, evidenced by a perfect score for professors, and offers exceptional value for students. Conversely, facilities and location are areas needing significant improvement, both receiving low ratings. Student life, accommodation, and internationality fall into the mid-range, suggesting a generally adequate but not outstanding experience in these aspects.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff and vibrant student life, both earning a high 4.5 rating. Facilities and accommodation also score well at 4, as does its international appeal and overall value. The university's location receives the lowest mark at 3.5, representing its primary area for potential improvement.

This institution shows particularly strong performance in terms of Value, with an impressive rating. Professors and Student Life also received high marks, indicating a positive academic and social environment. The university's weakest area is Accomodation, which received a significantly lower score compared to other aspects. Facilities and Internationality are moderately rated, while Location received a solid score.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews indicate a strong academic foundation and vibrant student life for ~74% of students. Professors are highly regarded, and programs show good job market alignment. A small portion of feedback (~17%) criticizes poor management and a lack of structure.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight innovative content, practical projects, and welcoming staff.

This university has a high average rating of 4/5 stars. Feedback highlights effective teaching methods and practical learning experiences. No negative reviews were submitted.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 2 positive reviews highlight faculty support and innovative programs. No negative reviews were submitted.

All 7 reviews are positive, yielding a 4.71/5 average. Students praise strong theoretical foundations, practical application, approachable professors, and personal/professional growth.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
0%
100%
0%
50%
71%
0%
4★
33%
0%
0%
100%
50%
29%
0%
3★
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
terrible

I've never seen such incompetence anywhere else. management is terrible system doesn't live up to expectations education in most institutions completely lacks structure cheap material that doesn't work

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close