Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia - UNED vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad Tecnológica del Valle de Toluca - UTVT vs Universidad Panamericana vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 85 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible online learning with excellent support and tools
- +Great teachers and attentive staff
- +Ideal for working students and self-paced study
- +Leadership and values development
- +Academic excellence and practical application
- +Supportive community and modern facilities
- +Holistic student development and practical skill application.
- +Emphasis on core values like responsibility and teamwork.
- +Focus on professional development and tangible skills.
- +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
- +Strong business programs and professional connections
- +Personalized attention and strong sense of community
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- +Flexible study options for balancing work and life
- +Supportive and welcoming community
- +High-quality nursing program with hands-on experience
- -Poor communication and organizational issues are prevalent.
- -Limited student interaction and lack of support from instructors are significant drawbacks.
- -The learning experience often feels superficial, focused on passing exams rather than acquiring knowledge.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
- -Excessive workload and challenging assignments.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty and administration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
- -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
- -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor quality of education
- -Disregard for student well-being
Academic and career prospects stand out, with professors and value receiving the highest marks at 3.875. The university also scores well in location and internationality, both above 3.4. However, student life and accommodation present areas for improvement, with ratings of 2.5625 and 2.375 respectively. Facilities also lag behind, scoring 2.8125.
This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.
Across all surveyed categories, the institution received uniform ratings of zero. This indicates no particular strength or weakness, as all aspects—facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value—are assessed at the lowest possible level. The consistent scoring suggests a critical need for improvement across the entire university experience.
The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.
Nothing to show
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Accomodation, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Student Life and Professors also stand out with strong scores of 3.75. Internationality is the area with the lowest rating at 3.5, though still respectable. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positive picture.
Approximately 85% of reviews are positive, praising flexible online learning, supportive teachers, and good resources. Around 15% express concerns about outdated content, poor website functionality, and lack of student interaction.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.
The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating. This suggests ~100% positive feedback, highlighting quality certifications and professional development principles.
University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
Most reviews are positive (~75%), highlighting flexibility for work-study balance and personal/professional growth, particularly in the nursing program. Some negative feedback exists (~25%), citing disorganization and a focus on profit.
I am finishing the degree in ADE, in general, I believe that distance education is undervalued by society, when in my opinion it should be better qualified. In this university you learn to manage time and be constant. My experience has always been very good, although sometimes frustrating. The classes are one hour once a week in my case because I have a seat nearby, anyway the interesting thing is to be able to follow the classes with your computer from home, and see, in many of the subjects, more than one teacher explaining it It costs much more than a face-to-face one without a doubt, nevertheless you can combine it with the work or domestic tasks whenever you distribute yourself at least two hours of the day to the study. My advice: go slowly the first year, not throwing for the 10 subjects at once, then there is always time to expand enrollment if we can with more. Many luck and if you need more advice around here I will be.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
If you have the option to study in Poland, then do not enroll in this school. This school has been a pain for many international students. They are an unorganized institution, and I do not even want to start explaining why they are already on the probationary list with the Polish government. Instead of providing higher education services to students, they tend to focus more on earning money from them rather than delivering high-quality education. You would be better off studying at other universities instead of this one. They have changed their name; it is now Powiślańska Akademia Nauk Stosowanych.
