Loyola College vs Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology vs Patrician College of Arts and Science - PCAS vs Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College vs Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies - VISTAS

Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering - SVCE (5.00)
Loyola College: wins 1/6 categories
Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology: wins 0/6 categories
Patrician College of Arts and Science - PCAS: wins 0/6 categories
Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College: wins 0/6 categories
Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies - VISTAS: wins 0/6 categories
The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University: wins 0/6 categories
Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering - SVCE: wins 5/6 categories
Comparing
Chennai, India
4.50
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Best programme: Physician Associate Studies
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Location
4.57
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Professors
4.60
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.13
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
4.33
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Value
4.13
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.47
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Versatile and specialized programs
  • +Encouraging and supportive faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and campus environment
  • +Strong academic programs and helpful teachers
  • +Excellent reputation for studies and placements
  • +Diverse course offerings in engineering and technology

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic foundation and multi-specialty exposure
  • +Good preparation for professional growth
  • +Excellent infrastructure and campus environment
  • +Relevant and up-to-date curriculum
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Poor communication and disorganized administration.
  • -Limited career support and networking opportunities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient support impact the learning experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives high marks for its professors and location, with ratings of 4.6 and approximately 4.57 respectively. Student life and internationality also score well, both around 4.13. Facilities are rated at a solid 4. The weakest area is accommodation, which scores 3.47, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.

The institution garners excellent marks in most areas, with accommodation standing out at a perfect 5. Facilities, professors, location, and student life all received a strong 4.5. Internationality is rated a solid 4, representing the only area below the highest tier. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture with consistently high scores.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution presents a well-rounded profile, with its strongest areas being **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving a commendable rating of 4. Conversely, **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, and **Internationality** are rated at a solid 3, indicating satisfactory but not exceptional performance across these aspects.

This institution demonstrates outstanding performance across nearly all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional strengths in these core areas. The location is the sole aspect rated slightly lower at a still respectable 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Students highly praise the university, with ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.47/5. Recurring themes include excellent professors, varied courses, and a beautiful campus with ample facilities. Accommodation costs are noted as expensive.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from two reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight helpful teachers and strong academics.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university receives a positive reception, with ~100% of feedback being favorable. Students highlight a solid academic foundation and broad specialty exposure. Career guidance is noted as an area with potential for improvement.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong academics, vibrant campus life, and growth opportunities. The campus is described as beautiful and spacious with modern facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
53%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
40%
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close