Loyola College vs University of Madras vs Ethiraj College for Women vs Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University - TNDALU vs Patrician College of Arts and Science - PCAS

Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Loyola College: wins 1/6 categories
University of Madras: wins 1/6 categories
Ethiraj College for Women: wins 3/6 categories
Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University - TNDALU: wins 1/6 categories
Patrician College of Arts and Science - PCAS: wins 0/6 categories
Om Sterling Global University: wins 0/6 categories
St.Peter's College of Engineering and Technology - SPCET: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Chennai, India
4.50
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Bachelor of Commerce in Accounting
Best programme: Law and Accounting
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Location
4.57
4.71
Win
4.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Professors
4.60
4.10
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.13
Win
3.80
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Student life
4.33
4.14
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.13
3.40
4.50
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
3.47
3.38
3.00
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Versatile and specialized programs
  • +Encouraging and supportive faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and campus environment
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +Engaging curriculum and practical application
  • +Supportive environment and skill development
  • +Inspiring and supportive atmosphere with invested faculty and administration.
  • +Empowerment and exposure leading to confidence and vision.
  • +Equal encouragement of academics, sports, and cultural activities.
  • +Excellent academic insights and quality education.
  • +Superior extracurricular activities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Poor communication and disorganized administration.
  • -Limited career support and networking opportunities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support from staff are consistently mentioned.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -A lack of adequate resources and support is a significant concern.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives high marks for its professors and location, with ratings of 4.6 and approximately 4.57 respectively. Student life and internationality also score well, both around 4.13. Facilities are rated at a solid 4. The weakest area is accommodation, which scores 3.47, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.

This institution shines particularly bright in its **location**, receiving an outstanding rating. Student life and professors also score well, indicating a positive academic and social environment. However, **accommodation** presents a notable area for improvement, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Internationality and value are also mid-range, suggesting potential for growth in these areas.

This institution scores exceptionally well in key areas such as **student life and professors**, both receiving a perfect 5. Its location and overall value are also highly regarded at 4.5. Conversely, accommodation stands out as its weakest point, with a rating of 3. Facilities and internationality are rated solidly at 4.

This institution achieves strong scores in key areas, with facilities, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Student life and value for money are areas showing slightly less strength, each scoring a 3. This suggests a well-rounded university experience with particular advantages in its physical resources and global outlook.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Students highly praise the university, with ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.47/5. Recurring themes include excellent professors, varied courses, and a beautiful campus with ample facilities. Accommodation costs are noted as expensive.

With an average rating of 4.3/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~80%). Students highlight excellent faculty, engaging curriculum, and career preparation. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 5/5, these reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight an inspiring and supportive atmosphere, with faculty and administration invested in their journeys. They also praise cultural festivals and a sense of empowerment and vision.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. The feedback is entirely positive, highlighting strong academic insights and excellent extracurricular activities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
53%
50%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
40%
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
7%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close