Université Nice-Sophia Antipolis - UNS vs Paris Graduate School of Digital Innovation - EPITECH vs EDHEC Business School vs IPAG Business School vs IDRAC Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 76 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: IDRAC Business School (5.00)
Université Nice-Sophia Antipolis - UNS: wins 0/3 categories
Paris Graduate School of Digital Innovation - EPITECH: wins 0/3 categories
EDHEC Business School: wins 0/3 categories
IPAG Business School: wins 0/3 categories
IDRAC Business School: wins 3/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Management and Marketing
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor in Innovation and Business Development Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
5.00
4.20
3.38
5.00
Location
3.63
4.00
3.73
4.77
5.00
Win
Professors
3.88
5.00
4.32
3.77
5.00
Internationality
3.81
5.00
4.41
3.86
5.00
Student life
3.25
5.00
4.14
3.86
5.00
Value
3.75
4.00
4.05
3.74
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.56
3.00
3.14
3.17
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging programs and dedicated professors
  • +Vibrant international and diverse community
  • +Supportive environment with career preparation
  • +Innovative, hands-on learning approach
  • +Strong emphasis on independence and self-sufficiency
  • +Challenging but rewarding educational experience
  • +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
  • +Strong alumni network and career services support
  • +International exposure and diverse student body
  • +professors' experience and attentive support
  • +student-centric adaptability and feedback incorporation
  • +international environment and friendly community
  • +Approachable and supportive professors
  • +Practical learning and real-world experience
  • +International environment and personal development
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance are frustrating.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of student well-being focus and a profit-driven approach that compromises educational quality.
  • -Insufficient focus on soft skills development alongside technical education.
  • -High cost relative to the perceived value or quality of education.
  • -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
  • -Poor course availability and low academic standards.
  • -Inefficient and unhelpful administrative support.
  • -Delays in receiving essential documentation like certificates.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -A lack of communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
Rating summary
What students say

Assessing the university's performance reveals a diverse set of strengths and weaknesses. The highest marks were awarded to professors and internationality, indicating excellent academic guidance and a global outlook. Conversely, student life received the lowest rating, suggesting areas for improvement in campus engagement and activities. Other aspects like facilities, accommodation, and value fall within a solid mid-range.

This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and student life, alongside strong internationality. Location also scores well, contributing to a positive overall impression. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, receiving a moderate rating. The value proposition is considered good, reflecting a generally positive assessment with room for improvement in housing.

Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.

The university demonstrates a notably strong performance in its **location**, receiving a perfect score. It also scores highly in **student life** and **internationality**, both at 3.86. Conversely, **accommodation** emerged as the lowest-rated aspect. **Facilities** also present an area for potential improvement, scoring 3.38. Other areas like professors and value received solid, mid-range scores.

Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated as outstanding. With a consistent five-star performance across every category, there are no discernible weak areas to highlight. The university demonstrates a uniformly strong offering.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 3.81/5 from 16 reviews, ~74% are positive. Students appreciate the pleasant study environment, interesting programs, and vibrant community. Some organizational issues were noted.

With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are mixed, with approximately 25% positive and 50% negative feedback. Recurring themes include a strong technical environment versus a lack of soft skills training, and concerns about the school's focus on profit over student well-being.

With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.

Around 80% of reviews are positive, praising good career focus, attentive professors, and international environments. Some negative feedback highlights disorganization and slow administrative support.

Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise the program's fulfillment of expectations, approachable professors, practical learning, and strong industry connections. The international environment and focus on personal development are also highlighted.

Rating distribution
5★
13%
0%
39%
20%
100%
4★
56%
25%
52%
60%
0%
3★
31%
25%
9%
0%
0%
2★
0%
25%
2%
10%
0%
1★
0%
25%
0%
10%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Enriching Experience

I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.

Bachelor in business administration

The people that are supposed to help you at IPAG are not going to do it, and if they do it would take as long as they want it to take, for example, I tried to renew my visa with the university because they told me like that was easier and it took 8 months in the process, my visa got expired, I almost got kicked out of the country and I ended up doing the process myself. Besides this, I just graduated this year on august and as well as all my classmates we have been trying to get our certificates and our grades in order to start to work or to continue our postgraduate studies but they just don't want to give us all this. IPAG is not a university with organization and neither who cares about their students, just about your money. If you are foreign you will get to know people from all the world and you will have a good experience but you can do this also at any other university in europe and you would be way more taken in count.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close