Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - UAM vs Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Mexicana - UNIMEX vs Universidad Anáhuac vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 89 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Professional Institute of Therapies and Humanities - IPETH (5.00)
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - UAM: wins 0/5 categories
Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Mexicana - UNIMEX: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 1/5 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Ironhack: wins 1/5 categories
Professional Institute of Therapies and Humanities - IPETH: wins 3/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration and Social Policy
Best programme: Architecture and Civil Engineering
Best programme: Global Law
Best programme: Communication
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Applied Medical Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.14
3.70
4.00
4.53
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Location
4.00
4.19
4.75
4.49
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Professors
4.43
4.13
4.50
4.42
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.86
3.90
2.50
4.58
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
4.71
4.27
4.25
4.63
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Value
4.71
4.57
4.25
4.58
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.86
3.66
2.75
4.64
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and supportive teaching staff
  • +High-quality, relevant curriculum and academic resources
  • +Excellent facilities and affordability
  • +Dedicated and highly qualified instructors
  • +Relevant and industry-tailored programs
  • +Excellent student training and preparation for the future
  • +Flexible study schedules and efficient degree completion
  • +Good teaching quality and career-focused outcomes
  • +Adequate study facilities and convenient campus structure
  • +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
  • +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
  • +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Supportive and understandable teaching with focus on applied learning.
  • +Excellent educational programs and certifications.
  • +Great facilities contributing to a satisfactory experience.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication is poor and unclear.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Lack of timely and effective communication.
  • -Inconsistent and unfair grading practices.
  • -Inadequate and outdated facilities and resources.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in **Student Life** and **Value**, both receiving ratings above 4.6. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.37. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, rated at 3.81, closely followed by **Location** and **Internationality**, which are slightly below 4.0. Facilities and Professors also score well.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value**, receiving a high rating. **Student Life** and **Location** also stand out positively. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Facilities** are rated lower compared to other aspects, indicating potential areas for improvement. The university scores moderately well in **Professors** and **Internationality**.

This university garners impressive scores in several key areas, particularly excelling in Location (4.75) and Professors (4.475). Student Life and Facilities also receive strong marks. However, significant weaknesses are evident in Accomodation (2.625) and Internationality (2.6), suggesting these aspects may require considerable improvement for prospective students. Overall, the university offers a compelling experience with room for growth.

This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Internationality all received perfect marks, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. Value also stands out with a top rating. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a moderate score of 3. Location also performed well, but was not as strong as the top-rated categories.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 10 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.7/5. Students praise the rigorous and relevant curriculum, supportive and expert teaching staff, and excellent facilities.

With an average rating of 4.32/5 from 34 reviews, ~82% are positive, praising dedicated teachers and well-structured courses. A small amount of feedback (~0%) mentions challenges with infrastructure.

With a ~4/5 average rating, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Recurring themes include appreciation for useful academic programs and flexible scheduling. No negative reviews were submitted.

University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the feedback highlights excellent teachers, effective learning methods, and great facilities. This overwhelmingly positive sentiment (~100%) indicates a strong student satisfaction.

Rating distribution
5★
70%
50%
40%
62%
0%
50%
100%
4★
30%
32%
20%
35%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
18%
40%
3%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close