Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - UAM vs Copenhagen Business School - CBS vs Université de Montréal vs National Institute of Advanced Technologies of Brittany - ENSTA Bretagne vs Hogeschool Gent - HoGent
Side-by-side comparison from 70 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and supportive teaching staff
- +High-quality, relevant curriculum and academic resources
- +Excellent facilities and affordability
- +Strong academic programs and professional development
- +Excellent career prospects and industry connections
- +Modern facilities and supportive learning environment
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Diverse and challenging course offerings
- +Hands-on learning and research opportunities
- +High academic level, diverse specializations, and preparation for industry.
- +Opportunities for personal development across multiple fields.
- +Engaging campus life and exciting student activities.
- +Practical field exposure & industry professionals as instructors
Nothing to show
- +Free, diverse professional courses
- +Accessible, hands-on job market training
- +Valuable internship pathways
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication is poor and unclear.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent problem.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or not well-taught.
- -Limited class options and poor social life.
- -Outdated and depressing campus facilities.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and communication from instructors is a problem.
- -Lack of qualified teachers and poor communication regarding substitutes.
- -Unsupportive and unaccommodating staff, particularly in internship support.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching and lack of objectivity in some classes.
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant course content is a major concern.
This university garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in **Student Life** and **Value**, both receiving ratings above 4.6. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.37. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, rated at 3.81, closely followed by **Location** and **Internationality**, which are slightly below 4.0. Facilities and Professors also score well.
This institution garners exceptional praise for its facilities, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors and internationality also received strong marks, reflecting positively on the academic and global aspects. Student life, while decent, is not as robust as other areas. Accommodation stands out as the weakest point, with the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. The overall value of the university is rated positively.
Overall, this university garners favorable reviews, with professors receiving the highest marks at 4.24. Student life and value for money are also well-regarded, both scoring 4.03. Facilities and internationality are similarly strong, with ratings around 4.11 and 4.19 respectively. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which sits at 3.71.
This institution garners exceptional scores for its **Facilities** and **Value**, both receiving a perfect 5. Conversely, **Location** and **Accommodation** represent the areas with the lowest ratings, scoring a 3. The university also performs well in **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, each earning a solid 4.
The university scores highly in location, earning a notable 4.5. Accommodation also receives a positive rating of 4. Areas of solid performance include professors, student life, and internationality, all with scores of 3.5. The university's weakest area is facilities, rated at 3.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a solid overall performance, with its facilities receiving the highest possible rating of 5. Strong areas include professors, location, student life, internationality, and value, all scoring a respectable 4. The weakest area is accommodation, rated at 3, suggesting this aspect could be an opportunity for improvement.
All 10 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.7/5. Students praise the rigorous and relevant curriculum, supportive and expert teaching staff, and excellent facilities.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic rigor, practical experience, and promising job prospects. Top facilities and strong industry connections are frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.
University of Montreal reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~97%), highlighting knowledgeable professors, engaging coursework, and helpful staff. A small amount of negative feedback (~3%) mentioned limited course options, a dated campus, and social life challenges.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is highly praised. Students value the high academic level, competent teachers, and diverse course offerings enabling career readiness. Campus life is also described as exciting.
With an average rating of 3/5, reviews are split evenly. Positive feedback highlights engaging guest lectures and real-world practice, while negative comments cite issues with consistent teaching staff, biased instructors, and unsupportive administrative interactions.
Nothing to show
With one review, this institution is highly rated at 4/5 stars. Positive feedback highlights free professional courses and internship opportunities. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
In CBS you can expect an environment of proactive thinking and growth. The university staff is always open to help and to debate. The teaching methods balance theoretical knowledge and practical skills enabling the student with capacity and confidence to enter the job market successfully. The existence of students from all over the world stimulates discussion and promotion of different cultures, ideas and perspectives. I highly recommend this university for students in business-related areas.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
We didn't have a biology teacher for a full year. 4 different substitute teachers that weren't informed well by HoGent. The arts class is very educational, but the teacher is not objectieve at all. Was talking to the internship supporter, she doesn't let jou talk. Can't get a word in between. Very annoying. I don't feel like she cared to listen. She doesn't care. It's not okey! Don't expect support. There are some really sweet teachers. But overall no great support or organization.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
