Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - UAM vs Pascual Bravo university institution - I.U. Pascual Bravo vs West virginia State university vs Université GSI Madagascar vs The University of Biskra

Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - UAM (4.70)
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - UAM: wins 6/7 categories
Pascual Bravo university institution - I.U. Pascual Bravo: wins 0/7 categories
West virginia State university: wins 1/7 categories
Université GSI Madagascar: wins 0/7 categories
The University of Biskra: wins 0/7 categories
About Madagascar National Tele-Education Center - CNTEMAD: wins 0/7 categories
University of Antananarivo: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration and Social Policy
Institute, West Virginia, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Antananarivo, Madagascar
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Antananarivo, Madagascar
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
Win
3.00
4.00
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.98
3.00
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.37
Win
3.00
4.00
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.86
Win
3.00
3.00
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.66
Win
3.00
3.00
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.67
Win
3.00
4.00
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.81
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and supportive teaching staff
  • +High-quality, relevant curriculum and academic resources
  • +Excellent facilities and affordability

Nothing to show

  • +Affordable education and living options
  • +Memorable campus experience

Nothing to show

  • +engaging and effective teaching methods
  • +relevant and practical curriculum
  • +supportive and inspiring learning environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication is poor and unclear.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor communication and disorganization from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and curriculum.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of innovative content are major frustrations.
  • -Ineffective teaching styles and lack of professorial engagement are a concern.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in **Student Life** and **Value**, both receiving ratings above 4.6. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.37. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, rated at 3.81, closely followed by **Location** and **Internationality**, which are slightly below 4.0. Facilities and Professors also score well.

Nothing to show

Considering the provided scores, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **facilities, professors, location, and overall value, all earning a solid 4 out of 5.** Student life and internationality also receive a decent rating of 3. However, a significant weakness is evident with **accommodation, which received a zero rating**, indicating a serious deficit in this area.

Nothing to show

This institution receives its highest marks for **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both scoring a perfect 1. However, its **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** received moderate ratings of 2. The **Location** stands out with a score of 3, indicating a less impressive aspect compared to others. **Accomodation** also received a low score of 1, suggesting room for improvement in this area.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 10 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.7/5. Students praise the rigorous and relevant curriculum, supportive and expert teaching staff, and excellent facilities.

Nothing to show

With one review, the average rating is 4/5. The positive feedback highlights a good education and beautiful campus. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

This university receives predominantly negative feedback, with ~100% of reviews being critical. The single review highlights concerns about an overly theoretical program with outdated information and uninspired professors. The average rating is a low 1/5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
70%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
30%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close