Université du Littoral - UCLO vs Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA vs Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca vs Michael Okpara University of Agriculture Umudike - MOUAU vs Angeles University Foundation - AUF

Side-by-side comparison from 32 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: LUT University - LUT (4.30)
Université du Littoral - UCLO: wins 0/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca: wins 5/6 categories
Michael Okpara University of Agriculture Umudike - MOUAU : wins 0/6 categories
Angeles University Foundation - AUF: wins 0/6 categories
LUT University - LUT: wins 1/6 categories
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komunikasi Almamater Wartawan Surabaya: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Foreign Languages
Best programme: Biochemistry
Lappeenranta, Finland
4.30
Top
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.17
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
Location
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.26
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.74
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.15
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.58
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.96
Not rated
3.75
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.50
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and passionate professors
  • +Strong foundational knowledge and skill development
  • +Valuable academic and professional preparation
  • +Qualified lecturers and guidance in career pursuit
  • +Versatile skill development and opportunity for self-expression
  • +High standard of learning and character molding

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, project-based learning with real-world relevance
  • +Rigorous, well-structured academic environment and supportive professors
  • +Strong industry focus and modern, practical curriculum

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Unresponsive faculty and a perceived lack of support contribute to negative experiences.
  • -Lack of sufficient seating and inadequate lab facilities.
  • -Difficulty adapting to the learning system and early lectures.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect score of 5. Professors and student life are also well-regarded, achieving solid ratings of 4. Internationality also scores a respectable 4. Overall, the university presents a strong offering, with its facilities, location, and accommodation standing out as its most prominent strengths.

This institution garners its highest marks for value, closely followed by excellent ratings for its professors and student life. Conversely, the university's facilities and internationality received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories, suggesting room for improvement in these areas. Accommodation and location also present a more moderate standing.

Nothing to show

Overall, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and campus environment. Professors received an excellent rating of 4.5, closely followed by facilities at 4.25. Student life and accommodation also scored well, both at 4.0. The university's weaker areas lie in its location and internationality, with ratings of 3.5 in both categories. Value for money is rated moderately at 3.75.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review at 4/5 stars, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). The single review highlights a solid foreign languages program, passionate professors, and valuable skill development. There is no negative feedback.

The majority of students (~74%) praise qualified lecturers and high learning standards. A smaller portion (~11%) mentions issues like tight schedules or inadequate seating. The average rating is 3.89/5.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical, project-based learning and a research-oriented academic environment. Minimal negative feedback exists, with no specific recurring themes mentioned.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
50%
0%
4★
0%
0%
100%
33%
0%
25%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
22%
0%
25%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student Representative

My opinion about this University is this, it is a reputable and recommendable citadel of learning for all. My experience with the school is fair most times and rarely hectic. What stood out is actually the classes and the professors.

Nothing to show

Strong practical focus coursework.

From my perspective, my experience at LUT University has been positive overall. I especially liked the strong focus on project-based and practical coursework, which helped me gain real-world skills. The academic environment is calm and research-oriented. However, I felt that the university is not very supportive when it comes to helping international students find jobs. Overall, I would recommend it to students who are independent and proactive.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close