National University of Science and Technology - NUST vs Islamabad Medical and Dental College - IMDC vs Hazara University vs Pakistan Institute of Development Economics - PIDE

Side-by-side comparison from 54 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics - PIDE (5.00)
National University of Science and Technology - NUST: wins 3/7 categories
Islamabad Medical and Dental College - IMDC: wins 0/7 categories
Hazara University: wins 1/7 categories
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics - PIDE: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Islamabad, Pakistan
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.10
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Location
4.47
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Professors
4.14
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.59
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Student life
4.22
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
Value
4.27
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.76
Win
Not rated
3.50
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive faculty and well-structured courses, particularly in engineering, IT, and management
  • +Vibrant campus life with numerous clubs, societies, and events
  • +Research focus and analytical development, with programs relevant to industry

Nothing to show

  • +Good teachers and teaching quality.
  • +Positive learning environment.
  • +Supportive and accessible faculty
  • +Career development guidance
Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of engaging events.
  • -Toxic university environment and frequent illness among students.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum is seen as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
  • -Lack of essential resources and effective support systems hinder learning.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with its **Location** standing out as the strongest area, achieving a rating of 4.47. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also received favorable scores around 4.1 and 4.2 respectively. Areas for potential improvement include **Internationality** and **Accomodation**, which received lower ratings of 3.59 and 3.76. **Value** for money is also a significant strength at 4.27.

Nothing to show

This institution garners strong marks in several key areas. Student life and professor quality both achieved an impressive 4.5, indicating a vibrant campus and excellent academic staff. Facilities and internationality also received solid ratings of 4. However, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.5, suggesting potential room for improvement in this aspect. Overall, the university offers a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in its academic and social offerings.

With outstanding scores in teaching quality and global outlook, this institution shines brightly. Professors are highly rated at a perfect 5, mirroring the exceptional internationality. Conversely, the university's location and accommodation options received more moderate feedback, both scoring a 3. Facilities and student life are well-regarded, achieving solid 4s, while the overall value proposition is also rated a perfect 5, indicating strong satisfaction in these areas.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 80% of 51 reviews praise the university's amazing environment, supportive faculty, and strong campus life. A few (~4%) mention outdated curriculum or a toxic environment.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good teaching and a positive university experience.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being 4–5 stars. Students particularly praise the faculty's helpfulness and openness, along with their guidance on professional and career development.

Rating distribution
5★
49%
0%
50%
100%
4★
31%
0%
50%
0%
3★
16%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close