Rennes School of Business vs emlyon business school vs NEOMA Business School vs Audencia Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie

Side-by-side comparison from 153 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Rennes School of Business: wins 0/6 categories
emlyon business school: wins 2/6 categories
NEOMA Business School: wins 1/6 categories
Audencia Business School: wins 0/6 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/6 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/6 categories
Schiller International University: wins 3/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Management
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: MSc in International Management & Business
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Best programme: International Business
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.12
4.22
Win
3.95
3.85
4.00
3.58
3.92
Location
4.24
4.66
3.84
4.00
3.57
4.08
4.92
Win
Professors
4.29
4.12
4.20
4.03
4.00
4.00
4.62
Win
Internationality
4.32
4.63
4.15
4.29
4.14
4.00
4.92
Win
Student life
4.41
4.30
4.42
Win
3.93
3.71
4.17
4.15
Value
4.18
4.49
Win
4.25
4.16
4.00
3.67
4.23
Accommodation
3.85
4.00
4.00
3.47
3.50
3.25
3.62
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, real-world learning and experienced faculty
  • +Diverse and international student and faculty community
  • +Welcoming and supportive learning environment
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +Professionalizing opportunities and strong alumni network
  • +Engaging courses with diverse international classmates and professional professors
  • +Vibrant student community and associations
  • +Excellent professors, classes, and facilities.
  • +Diverse international student community and cultural immersion.
  • +Well-structured programs and ample opportunities for professional development and city exploration.
  • +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
  • +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
  • +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Practical, experiential learning with real-world application.
  • +Strong international focus, diversity, and global opportunities.
  • +Supportive faculty and high-quality teaching.
  • +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
  • +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
  • -Poor English communication from staff and professors is a major frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues create constant problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and in disrepair.
  • -Course content is frequently irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Lack of practical training and outdated facilities.
  • -Unresponsive professors and poor management.
  • -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
  • -Expensive tuition for irrelevant courses and unqualified instructors.
  • -Lack of student motivation and engagement in academics.
  • -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
  • -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
Rating summary
What students say

Assessing the university's performance reveals a generally positive reception from students. Student life stands out as the strongest area, alongside internationality and professors, all receiving high marks. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest point, scoring notably lower than other aspects. Other categories like facilities, location, and value also garnered solid, above-average ratings.

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

Overall, this university garners favorable reviews across multiple aspects. Student life emerges as the strongest area, achieving a notable 4.42. Professors and value are also highly rated at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Facilities represent the weakest point among the surveyed categories, scoring 3.95, though still indicating a generally positive experience.

Regarding its overall assessment, the institution performs best in **Internationality** (4.29) and **Value** (4.16). Professors also receive a high mark (4.03). The weakest area identified is **Accomodation** (3.47), though Facilities also scored relatively lower (3.85). Student Life and Location received solid ratings in the mid-range.

This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.

This institution garners particularly high marks for Student Life, averaging over 4.16, with Location also scoring well at 4.08. Professors and Internationality are also rated positively at a solid 4.0. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a 3.25 rating, while Facilities and Value are mid-range.

With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~97% positive feedback, students praise teaching methods, practical learning, global faculty, and strong business ties. A small fraction of reviews noted challenges for international students regarding language and administrative support.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 20 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise the program structure, interesting courses, professionalizing opportunities, and good student vibe. Some mention occasional teaching experience gaps.

With an average rating of 4.19/5, roughly 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent classes, professors, and facilities. One negative review expressed disappointment with a lack of practical training and professor engagement.

Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.

Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising practical and international teaching, supportive staff, and a great environment. One review (around 8%) expressed dissatisfaction with course relevance and teaching quality.

With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.

Rating distribution
5★
44%
63%
40%
31%
43%
25%
69%
4★
56%
27%
40%
63%
29%
42%
23%
3★
0%
10%
20%
0%
14%
25%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
8%
8%
1★
3%
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Exemplary institution

The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Focus on multicultural business management

I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.

Nothing to show

Engaging

ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close