Rennes School of Business vs Université de Paris Est Marne la Vallée - UPEM vs Audencia Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 91 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International faculty and diverse student body
- +Practical learning and excellent academic quality
- +Welcoming and supportive learning environment
- +Engaging and supportive professors
- +Well-structured courses with practical application
- +Vibrant and inclusive student life
- +Excellent professors, classes, and facilities.
- +Diverse international student community and cultural immersion.
- +Well-structured programs and ample opportunities for professional development and city exploration.
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Supportive, approachable professors and strong emphasis on practical, real-world business applications.
- +Diverse, international environment fostering personal growth and unforgettable shared experiences.
- +Opportunities for teamwork, self-discovery, and engaging learning through case studies and projects.
- +Practical, real-world learning and international environment
- +Supportive staff and quality teaching
- +Engaging content and diverse student body
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Lack of English communication and support for international students is a problem.
- -Poor quality of professors' English skills is a concern.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause frustration.
- -Overcrowded classes and inadequate teaching staff hinder individual attention.
- -Lack of practical training and outdated facilities.
- -Unresponsive professors and poor management.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty are prevalent complaints.
- -Outdated and irrelevant course content and teaching.
- -Poor value for money due to high costs and ineffective curriculum.
- -Disengaged student body focused on social activities over academics.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Student life and internationality stand out with the highest ratings, suggesting a vibrant and globally-minded campus environment. Professors and location also receive excellent scores. While generally well-regarded, accommodation presents the weakest area of the university's profile, scoring notably lower than other aspects. Value and facilities are rated competently, indicating a solid overall offering.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its vibrant **Student Life** and outstanding **Value**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities** and **Professors** are also highly rated at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, with a rating of 3.5. **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are well-regarded at 4.
Regarding its overall assessment, the institution performs best in **Internationality** (4.29) and **Value** (4.16). Professors also receive a high mark (4.03). The weakest area identified is **Accomodation** (3.47), though Facilities also scored relatively lower (3.85). Student Life and Location received solid ratings in the mid-range.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This university garners an impressive average rating of 4.19. Its strongest areas are **Internationality** (4.57) and **Student Life** (4.34), indicating a vibrant and globally connected campus environment. **Facilities** (4.24) and **Location** (4.27) also score very well. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, receiving a rating of 3.74, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
With impressive scores in several key areas, this university excels in its Professors, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving a strong 4.2. Location and Value also garnered positive marks at 4. However, the Facilities, rated at 3.7, and Accomodation, at 3.3, represent the areas with the most room for improvement.
Nothing to show
With a 4.33/5 average rating from 33 reviews, ~97% are positive. Students praise diverse, expert faculty, practical learning, and a welcoming, inclusive atmosphere. Some negative feedback (~3%) mentions administrative and language barriers for international students.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight enriching academic experiences with knowledgeable professors and vibrant student life. There were no negative reviews in the sample.
With an average rating of 4.19/5, roughly 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent classes, professors, and facilities. One negative review expressed disappointment with a lack of practical training and professor engagement.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
The reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting excellent professors, practical courses, and a strong international environment. Students appreciate teamwork opportunities and the school's ability to foster personal growth and unforgettable experiences.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students highlight practical, international, and supportive learning environments with quality teaching and facilities. One negative review (~10%) cited relevance and cost concerns.
Nothing to show
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
Nothing to show
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
Nothing to show
