Rennes School of Business vs Audencia Business School vs Excelia Business School vs Institut Mines Telecom Business School- IMT Business School vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 143 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and real-world focused learning
- +International and experienced faculty
- +Welcoming and diverse community
- +High-quality faculty and well-designed academic programs
- +Diverse international student community and networking opportunities
- +Excellent facilities and desirable city location for students
- +Practical curriculum and quality teaching
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Career preparation and alumni network
- +Socially inclusive and affordable for all students.
- +Strong sense of community and cultural diversity.
- +High-quality, practical education with flexible pathways
- +Vibrant campus life with numerous activities and events
- +Supportive and international learning environment
- +Approachable and supportive professors
- +Practical learning and real-world experience
- +International environment and personal development
- +Strong career advancement and market-relevant skills.
- +High-quality faculty and engaging curriculum.
- +Welcoming community and supportive staff.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Poor English communication and support for international students are prevalent.
- -Lack of adequate facilities and resources are noted.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of practical training.
- -Unresponsive and critical professors.
- -Limited opportunities for student interaction and networking.
- -Superficial course content and lack of practical application
- -Unprofessional training and limited career support relative to cost
- -Mismatch between program offerings and student expectations
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from administrative and faculty staff.
- -Inflexible policies and an overwhelming workload create undue stress.
- -Poorly prepared and unhelpful professors.
- -Disorganized and irrelevant course content.
- -High cost for low value.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are prevalent.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
Student feedback indicates a generally positive university experience, with Student Life (4.35) and Internationality (4.32) emerging as particularly strong aspects. Professors (4.22) and Location (4.25) also received high marks. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, scoring 3.75, while Facilities are rated at 4.03. Value for money is also well-regarded at 4.11.
An overview of the university's ratings reveals several strengths. Notably, Internationality stands out with the highest score, indicating a particularly welcoming and diverse environment. Professors and Value also received high marks, suggesting strong academic instruction and a good return on investment. On the other hand, Accomodation received the lowest rating, pointing to a potential area for improvement. Facilities and Student Life also scored moderately.
Analyzing the provided ratings, the university excels particularly in **Internationality** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.25. **Location** also receives a strong endorsement. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.57. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a respectable mid-range, generally hovering around the 4.0 mark.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas. Notably, **Value** is exceptionally high, alongside excellent scores for **Student Life**, **Professors**, and **Internationality**. Conversely, the university's **Location** is its most significant drawback, receiving the lowest rating. **Accomodation** and **Facilities** fall within a moderate range, indicating areas for potential improvement amidst an otherwise positive assessment.
Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across various aspects. Its strongest areas are **Location** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.18), suggesting these are significant advantages. **Accomodation** (3.48) received the lowest score, indicating potential room for improvement in this category. Other ratings for Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value are all above 3.8, indicating generally positive feedback.
Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated as outstanding. With a consistent five-star performance across every category, there are no discernible weak areas to highlight. The university demonstrates a uniformly strong offering.
This university garners exceptional scores in academic and social aspects, with Professors receiving a near-perfect 4.8 and Internationality a strong 4.6. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded at 4.33. Location and Value are solid at 4.5 and 4 respectively. However, Accomodation stands out as a weaker area, scoring a significantly lower 3.
University reviews are largely positive (~97%), highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and professional development opportunities. A small amount of feedback mentions struggles with language barriers for international students.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 95% of reviews are positive. Students praise the learning environment, good installations, and the city. A small percentage of feedback (~5%) mentions disappointment with theoretical classes and professor availability.
~89% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical curriculum, good teaching, and international environments. A small minority (~5%) found courses superficial or lacking practical value.
With a 4/5 average rating from 2 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise the university's social inclusivity and strong sense of community, building a "family" atmosphere. There were no negative reviews.
With a 3.96 average rating from 23 reviews, ~82% highlight the school's high-quality education, diverse academic pathways, and vibrant campus life. A small portion (~9%) reported unprepared professors and organizational issues.
Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise the program's fulfillment of expectations, approachable professors, practical learning, and strong industry connections. The international environment and focus on personal development are also highlighted.
With 100% positive sentiment, student reviews highlight strong career advancement and valuable skills gained. Frequent themes include high-quality courses, competent professors, and practical relevance. Some students desired stronger post-graduation support and a more engaged alumni network.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
I am a Chinese student and I completed my MBA in Business Engineering at IDRAC Business School and the experience has been excellent. The program fully met my expectations. The professors are very approachable, supportive, and always available. I truly appreciated the strong sense of guidance and personal support throughout the course. Highly recommended!
Nothing to show
