Centrale Supelec vs Mediterranean University vs University of Montenegro vs University of Donja Gorica - UDG vs Malawi University of Science and Technology - Must

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Centrale Supelec: wins 3/6 categories
Mediterranean University: wins 0/6 categories
University of Montenegro: wins 0/6 categories
University of Donja Gorica - UDG: wins 0/6 categories
Malawi University of Science and Technology - Must: wins 0/6 categories
Chittagong College: wins 3/6 categories
Gazipur Agricultural University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Engineering
Podgorica, Montenegro
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Podgorica, Montenegro
3.60
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Computational and Applied Mathematics
Best programme: Biomedical Sciences
Chittagong, Bangladesh
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Chemistry
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.33
Win
Not rated
3.25
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
3.33
Not rated
4.29
2.50
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.00
Not rated
4.13
4.50
3.25
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.33
Win
Not rated
2.63
3.00
2.50
1.00
Not rated
Student life
5.00
Not rated
3.75
3.50
3.50
5.00
Not rated
Value
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.25
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.75
3.50
4.25
1.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent academic rigor and advanced, up-to-date courses
  • +High career prospects and strong earning potential
  • +Transformative mindset shift and supportive mentorship
  • +Interactive classes and professor engagement
  • +Small class sizes and organized faculty
  • +Faculty support and communication
  • +Engaging professors with real-world experience.
  • +Comprehensive curriculum offering theoretical and practical knowledge.
  • +Authentic cultural and historical learning experiences.
  • +strong curriculum balance
  • +dedicated and supportive faculty
  • +opportunities for practical experience
  • +Conducive environment with good infrastructure and accommodation
  • +Dedicated and progressive staff
  • +Adequate campus resources and vibrant student life
  • +Supportive and inspiring faculty and classmates
  • +Competitive yet motivating academic environment
  • +Good practical learning facilities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Poor communication and lack of student support are significant drawbacks.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently cited problems.
  • -A lack of effective communication and support is a recurring concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible policies and poor communication are significant problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary stress.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder effective learning and research.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency causes confusion.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and poor class organization are major issues.
  • -Students are frustrated by administrative and management problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring problems.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution garners strong marks, with Student Life receiving a perfect score. Facilities, Accomodation, and Internationality are also highly rated. The university's Value and Professors are well-regarded, while Location presents the weakest area, scoring noticeably lower than other aspects.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses within the areas of facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform zero scores suggest a need for comprehensive review and development in every aspect of the university's offerings.

This university is highly rated for its **location** (4.29) and **professors** (4.13), reflecting a positive academic and environmental experience. **Value** also scores well at 4.0. However, **internationality** is a notable area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating of 2.63. Other aspects like **student life** and **accommodations** are moderately rated at 3.75, with **facilities** at 3.25.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **professors**, earning a strong 4.5 rating. **Facilities** also score well at 4. However, the **location** presents a significant weakness, with a low rating of 2.5. Other areas such as student life, accommodation, and internationality fall into a moderate range, indicating room for improvement in certain aspects. The overall **value** is positively rated at 4.

Excellent scores mark the university's **facilities**, **location**, and **value**, all receiving a 4 or higher. **Accommodation** also stands out with a 4.25. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating at 2.5, indicating an area for potential improvement. **Student life** and **professors** received solid, though less exceptional, scores of 3.5 and 3.25 respectively.

This institution excels in several key areas, with professors, location, student life, and overall value receiving top marks of 5 out of 5. Facilities also score well at 4. However, significant challenges are evident in accommodation and internationality, both rated a low 1. These contrasting scores suggest a university with a highly positive academic and social experience but considerable room for improvement in housing and global engagement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 100% of feedback indicating high satisfaction. Students highlight excellent, comprehensive training with strong career prospects and high starting salaries. An international campus and supportive environment are also frequently praised.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight interactive classes and strong professor communication.

With 4 out of 8 reviews being positive (4-5 stars), students express happiness with their degree experience and comprehensive curricula. They also appreciate engaging professors and departments located in historically rich areas. Some wish for updated course content and more practical experience.

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, students highlight a good balance of theory and practical skills, and supportive faculty. No negative feedback was recorded.

University reviews show a generally positive sentiment, with ~75% of feedback being favorable. Students highlight good infrastructure and accommodation, though some note areas needing improvement in teaching quality and extracurricular activities.

With a 5/5 average rating from one review, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a motivating environment, supportive classmates and teachers, and good lab facilities, contributing to a very good college experience.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
25%
100%
13%
0%
25%
100%
0%
4★
75%
0%
38%
50%
50%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close