IÉSEG School of Management vs Rennes School of Business vs EDHEC Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 466 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Practical and real-world focused learning
- +International and experienced faculty
- +Welcoming and diverse community
- +High-quality, practical teaching from experienced professors
- +Strong industry connections and career support
- +Valuable alumni network and networking opportunities
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Practical curriculum and quality teaching
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Career preparation and alumni network
- +High-quality, practical education with flexible pathways
- +Vibrant campus life with numerous activities and events
- +Supportive and international learning environment
- +Flexible, remote, and work-study options
- +Personalized and supportive academic and professional guidance
- +Comprehensive courses and responsive, passionate trainers
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Poor English communication and support for international students are prevalent.
- -Lack of adequate facilities and resources are noted.
- -Steep tuition fees strain financial investment.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Superficial course content and lack of practical application
- -Unprofessional training and limited career support relative to cost
- -Mismatch between program offerings and student expectations
- -Poorly prepared and unhelpful professors.
- -Disorganized and irrelevant course content.
- -High cost for low value.
- -Administrative and management issues create constant frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a major drawback.
- -Limited course options and inflexible scheduling cause significant problems.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
Student feedback indicates a generally positive university experience, with Student Life (4.35) and Internationality (4.32) emerging as particularly strong aspects. Professors (4.22) and Location (4.25) also received high marks. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, scoring 3.75, while Facilities are rated at 4.03. Value for money is also well-regarded at 4.11.
An analysis of university ratings reveals a generally positive reception across key aspects. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest score. Conversely, accommodation was rated lowest among the surveyed categories. Facilities, professors, student life, and value all received solid marks, indicating a well-rounded student experience with areas for potential improvement.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
Analyzing the provided ratings, the university excels particularly in **Internationality** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.25. **Location** also receives a strong endorsement. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.57. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a respectable mid-range, generally hovering around the 4.0 mark.
Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across various aspects. Its strongest areas are **Location** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.18), suggesting these are significant advantages. **Accomodation** (3.48) received the lowest score, indicating potential room for improvement in this category. Other ratings for Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value are all above 3.8, indicating generally positive feedback.
This institution achieves outstanding marks, particularly excelling in Value with a near-perfect score. Professors, Location, and Accomodation also received exceptionally high ratings. Conversely, Internationality is the lowest-rated aspect, alongside Student Life, though still scoring well above average. Facilities also contribute positively to the overall university assessment.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
University reviews are largely positive (~97%), highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and professional development opportunities. A small amount of feedback mentions struggles with language barriers for international students.
~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting outstanding teaching quality, practical courses, and strong corporate/alumni networks for career development. One review expressed concerns about high tuition fees relative to investment.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
~89% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical curriculum, good teaching, and international environments. A small minority (~5%) found courses superficial or lacking practical value.
With a 3.96 average rating from 23 reviews, ~82% highlight the school's high-quality education, diverse academic pathways, and vibrant campus life. A small portion (~9%) reported unprepared professors and organizational issues.
All 36 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.92/5. Students praise the combination of theory and practice, flexibility of online courses, and dedicated support from trainers and staff for career development.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Very satisfied with my experience at ISCOD. Very fast integration: immediately taken care of by a super-efficient admissions officer, I found my internship in less than a week. The learning platform is very complete. Many relevant resources and tools are made available to us and/or brought to our attention. I didn’t want to go back to school face-to-face and I am particularly satisfied with the autonomy provided by online and digital learning. My learning coach follows me regularly and helps me in the progress of my training as well as in the development of my thesis. He is a professional in the field in which I train and our exchanges are always very enriching. The other students are volunteers and just ask to share and help each other! Thanks to the internship program, I learn much better since I directly apply what I learn. I get paid and school is free. I made the right choice.
