URL Pere Tarrés vs Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology - MMUST vs Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology - KAIST vs École Supérieure de Technologie vs Hanoi University of Industry
Side-by-side comparison from 109 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Dedicated professors with relevant experience
- +Engaging learning environment and active student participation
- +Strong vocational and humanistic focus of programmes
- +Nurturing environment for talent and skill development.
- +Quality learning with good lecturer-student ratio and practical focus.
- +Conducive learning environment with good infrastructure and technology.
- +High-quality academics and challenging curriculum
- +Excellent facilities and research opportunities
- +Financial benefits and student support
Nothing to show
- +Practical and industry-aligned curriculum
- +Supportive and enthusiastic professors
- +Friendly and welcoming student environment
Nothing to show
- +well-structured hospitality programs
- +quality education and qualified instructors
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Poor communication and unclear policies create confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent.
Nothing to show
- -Unresponsive administrative and management staff.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Ineffective and unengaging teaching methods.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received a consistent rating of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in areas such as facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value, based on the provided data.
An overall strong university profile emerges from these ratings, with particularly high scores for **Professors** (4.475) and **Value** (4.45). **Location** (4.378) and **Student Life** (4.351) also received excellent marks. The lowest-rated categories, though still respectable, are **Accomodation** (3.838) and **Internationality** (3.775). Facilities are rated moderately at 4.077.
Examining the provided ratings, the university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.75. **Value** also scores highly at 4.05. Conversely, **Internationality** presents the most significant area for improvement, with a rating of 2.55. Other categories like Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation fall within a moderate range, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those aspects.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates impressive strengths in its **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving a high score of 4.25. While generally well-regarded, **Accomodation** stands out as a comparatively weaker area with a rating of 3.75. Other aspects like Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value also received solid scores, indicating a positive overall student experience.
Nothing to show
This institution shines brightest in **Location** and **Internationality**, both earning a perfect score. **Value** also stands out with a top rating. On the other hand, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3. The university also scores well in **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, all receiving a solid 4.
University reviews are largely positive, with ~97.6% of feedback being favorable. Students praise the vocational and humanistic aspects, active participation, and engaging seminars. Some mention a need for more computers.
With a 4.35/5 average, ~88% of 40 reviews are positive, praising good lecturer-student ratios, talent nurturing, and conducive learning environments. A small ~5% of feedback is negative.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting good professors, peers, and overall satisfaction. The average rating is 3.9/5.
Nothing to show
With a 4.6/5 average rating from 5 reviews, ~80% are highly positive. Recurring themes praise practical IT curricula, supportive professors, and a welcoming environment. Limited facilities were a minor concern in some feedback.
Nothing to show
With one review, the average rating is a perfect 5/5. The single review is positive, highlighting a variety of well-structured academic programs and a dedication to quality education.
Nothing to show
Masinde Muliro university of science and technology has a system that defines and delivers expectations for students who have a passion for science and tech. It comprises a staff of positive-minded individuals towards education, who make the institution thrive in both academic and co-curricular activities. The university also has a support program for those who are unable to pay their tuition and fees thus transcending the barriers of illiteracy in the nation.
I did my undergrad in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science here, graduated in 2022. Pros: good research, great facilities, good programmes, completely free tuition, inexpensive accommodation + allowance, flexibility in course choice, wide material coverage, all pros of Korea (e.g. safety, convenient travelling) Cons: strict attendance, some lectures of poor quality, competition and relative grading, hard to make local friends/connections, all cons of Korea (e.g. no English whatsoever outside campus) The school is very much research-oriented, with lots and lots of great resources and facilities to do research. So if you want to do a research graduate or post-graduate course here and you like a particular programme, this is definitely a good place for you. That said, most profs are good researches, not necessarily good educators. University-wide policy is that every course essential for degree completion is taught in English. Thus, with a few exceptions in Humanities, and some very obscure courses, you won't have to learn Korean. The professors had to learn English though. And despite that most of them have lived for a certain period of time in the US, some really struggle to teach in English. In worst cases it will come down to the professor simply reading the slides in the lecture. Couple that with a strict attendance policy, you get a pure torture. On a positive note, most of the newly coming young profs are not like that. Lab/research experience is also very different across different professors. Some are complete grind where you only do what professor tells you to do, and end up working 55+ hours a week. Some are nice and cheerful productive environments where you can even have your name on the authors list of couple papers being an undergrad, and enjoy the research process throughout. The courses choice is wide and the programme is really flexible about what you do. This is especially true for larger departments like the School of Electrical Engineering - which is in fact, called "School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering" in Korean, and I don't even know why the word Electrical is even there - you won't get to learn anything like High Power Electrics. Depending on a course, the amount of theory and hands-on differs significantly from completely theoretical courses to labs with almost zero theory taught. Overall, I would like to get slightly more hands-on experience, but it was alright. The material coverage is on a very good balance in between breadth and depth. Perhaps, it's trying to get both breadth and depth, which results in a relatively high workload. And this high workload is something that is partly fuelled by all grading being done relatively. For example, to get an A, you don't have to score 90% - you have to be roughly above avg + 1 stddev of the normalised score distribution in your group. This encourages some instructors and assistants to either make the workload extremely high, or make the exams extremely difficult just for the sake of difficulty, or both. Yet, if you don't care too much about your grades, but still keep studying, it's hard to fail a particular course. Social life is something that is difficult to have in KAIST if you are an international student. 90% of the students are Korean, and most of them feel shy to/don't really want to reach out to international students. Reaching out to those people yourself will rarely help. Out of the remaining students most are not too much into socialising. What are the chances that you'll like the remaining few? Most clubs are also primarily Korean with all their activities conducted in Korean. Should be somewhat easier if you speak Korean, but not necessarily as easy as it would be elsewhere in the world.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show