The Higher Institute of Applied Studies in Humanities of Tunis - ISEAHT vs University of Tunis El Manar vs Universite Centrale - UC vs Esprit school of business vs Misr University for Science and Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Esprit school of business (5.00)
The Higher Institute of Applied Studies in Humanities of Tunis - ISEAHT: wins 0/6 categories
University of Tunis El Manar: wins 0/6 categories
Universite Centrale - UC: wins 0/6 categories
Esprit school of business: wins 3/6 categories
Misr University for Science and Technology: wins 1/6 categories
South Mediterranean University - Smu: wins 2/6 categories
Manouba University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Computer Information Systems
Best programme: Bachelor Business
Tunis, Tunisia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
2.80
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
1.00
3.20
Not rated
4.00
3.50
4.33
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.00
3.60
Not rated
4.33
4.50
4.60
Win
Not rated
Internationality
1.00
2.40
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Student life
1.00
3.60
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.50
4.60
Not rated
Value
3.00
3.60
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.00
4.60
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
3.00
Not rated
3.67
4.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and academic rigor.
  • +Vibrant student life and extracurricular opportunities.
  • +Strong career prospects and respected degrees.

Nothing to show

  • +Innovative and relevant curriculum
  • +Welcoming and good staff
  • +Strong business and engineering programs
  • +Supportive and understanding professors
  • +Innovative learning environment and future-ready skills
  • +Modern facilities and effective teaching methods
  • +Strong academic foundation and practical skill development
  • +Supportive and approachable professors
  • +Personal and professional growth opportunities

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management incompetence is a significant issue.
  • -Systems and educational structure fail to meet expectations.
  • -Outdated and ineffective materials are a problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are common complaints.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often perceived as inadequate.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a major drawback.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leads to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

A mixed but generally positive performance emerges from these university ratings. The institution excels in areas such as **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving a strong 3.6. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as the weakest point, rated at a lower 2.4, while **Facilities** also scored below average at 2.8. Other aspects like **Location** and **Accomodation** fall within the moderate range.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, internationality, and value, all receiving scores around 4.67. Professors are also highly rated at 4.33. Facilities and location are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, with a score of 3.67.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff and vibrant student life, both earning a high 4.5 rating. Facilities and accommodation also score well at 4, as does its international appeal and overall value. The university's location receives the lowest mark at 3.5, representing its primary area for potential improvement.

This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, with professors, student life, and overall value all receiving an outstanding 4.6. Its location is also highly regarded at 4.33. Facilities and internationality stand at a solid 4. The primary area for improvement, however, is accommodation, which received a lower rating of 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Most reviews are positive (~60%), highlighting vibrant student life, excellent professors, and job-market-aligned programs. One negative review (~20%) criticized management and education structure. The average rating is 3.4/5.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight innovative content, practical projects, and welcoming staff.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 2 positive reviews highlight faculty support and innovative programs. No negative reviews were submitted.

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.8/5. Students highlight strong foundational knowledge, practical skills development, and supportive professors.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
20%
0%
100%
50%
80%
0%
4★
0%
40%
0%
0%
50%
20%
0%
3★
100%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

terrible

I've never seen such incompetence anywhere else. management is terrible system doesn't live up to expectations education in most institutions completely lacks structure cheap material that doesn't work

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close