Comsats University - CUI vs National University of Science and Technology - NUST vs Capital University of Science and Technology - CUST vs Pakistan Institute of Development Economics - PIDE vs Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University

Side-by-side comparison from 124 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics - PIDE (5.00)
Comsats University - CUI: wins 0/7 categories
National University of Science and Technology - NUST: wins 4/7 categories
Capital University of Science and Technology - CUST: wins 0/7 categories
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics - PIDE: wins 3/7 categories
Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Islamabad, Pakistan
4.30
Read more reviews
67 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Biotechnology
Best programme: Economics
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.78
4.10
Win
3.80
4.00
Not rated
Location
3.60
4.47
Win
2.80
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.30
4.14
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.99
3.59
3.20
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.22
4.22
Win
3.60
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.21
4.27
3.60
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.29
3.76
Win
2.80
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Quality education and expert faculty
  • +Professional growth and diverse programmes
  • +Affordable tuition and good employment prospects
  • +Supportive faculty and well-structured courses, particularly in engineering, IT, and management
  • +Vibrant campus life with numerous clubs, societies, and events
  • +Research focus and analytical development, with programs relevant to industry
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable, supportive faculty.
  • +Valuable development of critical soft skills and personal confidence.
  • +Scholarships and diverse program offerings.
  • +Supportive and accessible faculty
  • +Career development guidance

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Unprofessional attitudes from supervisors and the management team.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of engaging events.
  • -Toxic university environment and frequent illness among students.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and lack of support negatively impact student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
  • -Lack of essential resources and effective support systems hinder learning.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

An analysis of the provided ratings reveals a university that excels in several key areas. Notably, **Professors** and **Student Life** received the highest scores, indicating strengths in academic instruction and campus engagement. **Value** also performed very well. Conversely, **Accomodation** garnered the lowest rating, suggesting this is the weakest area. While **Facilities** and **Location** received moderate scores, **Internationality** was also rated favorably.

Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with its **Location** standing out as the strongest area, achieving a rating of 4.47. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also received favorable scores around 4.1 and 4.2 respectively. Areas for potential improvement include **Internationality** and **Accomodation**, which received lower ratings of 3.59 and 3.76. **Value** for money is also a significant strength at 4.27.

This university's ratings show a mixed performance. Academics and campus experience are notable strengths, with Professors receiving a high mark of 4 and Student Life scoring a respectable 3.6. However, the university faces challenges in its physical environment and student support, as indicated by lower scores for Location and Accommodation, both at 2.8. Internationality and Value are moderately rated.

With outstanding scores in teaching quality and global outlook, this institution shines brightly. Professors are highly rated at a perfect 5, mirroring the exceptional internationality. Conversely, the university's location and accommodation options received more moderate feedback, both scoring a 3. Facilities and student life are well-regarded, achieving solid 4s, while the overall value proposition is also rated a perfect 5, indicating strong satisfaction in these areas.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~84% of 67 reviews) for its high-quality education, expert faculty, and professional development opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~1.5%) mentions unprofessional attitudes from supervisors and management.

Around 80% of 51 reviews praise the university's amazing environment, supportive faculty, and strong campus life. A few (~4%) mention outdated curriculum or a toxic environment.

With a 4.8/5 average rating from 5 reviews, students highlight strong academics and knowledgeable, supportive faculty. Scholarship opportunities are also a significant positive. No negative feedback was provided.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being 4–5 stars. Students particularly praise the faculty's helpfulness and openness, along with their guidance on professional and career development.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
52%
49%
80%
100%
0%
4★
31%
31%
20%
0%
0%
3★
15%
16%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Communication Skills

It's a good university if you lack communication skills and if you are not social.Studying in this university will improve your communication and interaction skills!So I would urge everyone to take admission in this university!

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close