ESIC Business & Marketing School vs IE University vs Escuela International de Gerencia - EIG vs Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera - CEU UCH vs Universidad de Granada - UGR
Side-by-side comparison from 407 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical learning, real-world projects, and industry connections.
- +Excellent teaching quality and knowledgeable professors.
- +Supportive campus environment and strong academic/personal guidance.
- +Outstanding professors and practical, career-focused learning
- +Highly international and entrepreneurial student environment
- +Vibrant campus life and valuable networking opportunities
- +Outstanding faculty support and engaging teaching.
- +Excellent facilities and resources for learning.
- +Guidance and opportunities for future career development.
- +Practical, real-world work experience and internships
- +Excellent, supportive, and passionate faculty
- +Positive international environment and community building
- +Strong academic level and knowledgeable professors
- +Vibrant city, culture, and affordability
- +Positive student-teacher relationships and social atmosphere
Nothing to show
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication regarding academic systems.
- -Lack of orientation and support for international students.
- -Misleading information about course delivery methods.
- -Academic quality and outdated course content.
- -Disappointing program management and misleading marketing.
- -Lack of traditional college experience due to corporate campus.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and administrative support cause frustration.
- -Lack of engagement and relevance in curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are major concerns.
- -Administrative & management issues cause disorganization and lack of student consideration.
- -Poor teaching quality and outdated academic practices are prevalent.
- -Exam scheduling and distribution of holidays are poorly managed.
Nothing to show
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in its **facilities**, which received a high rating. Conversely, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and **value** represent areas that received comparatively lower scores. Other aspects like professors, location, and student life fall within a moderate range of satisfaction.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its **Internationality**, scoring an impressive 4.77. **Location** also stands out with a strong rating of 4.55. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 3.78. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Student Life are generally well-regarded, as is the perceived Value.
Academic strengths significantly outshine other aspects, with Professors receiving the highest rating. Conversely, Student Life and Internationality represent areas with lower scores. Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately well, while Location and Value fall within a similar mid-range.
This institution garners particularly high marks for its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all scoring above 4.6. Professors also receive strong, consistent feedback. The university's **Location** is its comparatively lowest-rated aspect, though still within a generally positive range. Accommodation and Value are also rated favorably.
This institution receives its highest marks for Student Life, with a score of 4.59, closely followed by its Location and Internationality. Conversely, the university's weakest areas are Professors and Facilities, both scoring around 3.64 and 3.65 respectively. Accomodation and Value also show solid, above-average performance.
Nothing to show
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
With 4.13 stars from 55 reviews, ~85% of students praise the collaborative learning, practical projects with real companies, and good teaching quality. One review found the university experience poor.
Approximately 97% of reviews are positive, praising the modern campus, international environment, practical coursework, and networking opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback mentions academic deception and issues with specific programs.
With a 4.07 average rating from 15 reviews, students praise the university's excellent facilities, engaging lecturers, and diverse program offerings. All feedback was positive, with no negative reviews received.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~96% of feedback being favorable. Students highlight excellent faculty, good facilities, and valuable real-world work experience opportunities. No negative reviews were recorded.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting academics, affordability, and the enriching city experience. Approximately 14% of feedback is negative, citing disorganization and administrative issues.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡
ie university is the best university in the world, they education system is the best and infrastructure. It's the best university to put your child to I'm very happy with it i dont wanna lie l. Please go for it
Nothing to show
Studying Advertising and public relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera was an enriching and transformative experience. One thing I standout is the combined theoretical and practical skills we learned throughout the career. We work hand on hand with well known brands that give us a profesional view and a bigger understanding of the profesional world. The multicultural environment at CEU help me develop cultural sensibility and open my perspective because of the diverse backgrounds. The most enriching experience was living in the amazing city en Valencia, its stunning architecture and its amazing food. I graduated feeling confident and prepared to enter to the professional world.
The academic content of the master has been very interesting to me and I think I have learned a lot. Coordination I think it can improve since in the subjects taught by more than one teacher I have identified a lack of coherence. In relation to the practices, several problems have arisen since, when working with the juvenile protection or penal system, on several occasions it has taken more than the appropriate period to accept the practices. Also the list of centers that were offered last year, at which point I had to choose, this year they were not offered. However, the content of the master seems very good to me.
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
