Agricultural University of Georgia vs Caucasus University - CIU vs Ilia State University - ISU vs Georgian Technical University - GTU vs Alte University

Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Agricultural University of Georgia: wins 1/3 categories
Caucasus University - CIU: wins 0/3 categories
Ilia State University - ISU: wins 1/3 categories
Georgian Technical University - GTU: wins 0/3 categories
Alte University: wins 0/3 categories
Free University of Tbilisi: wins 1/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Agricultural Science
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Business Administration
Tbilisi, Georgia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Business
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
3.71
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.00
2.71
4.10
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Professors
5.00
3.57
3.80
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
3.00
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
Student life
5.00
2.86
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Value
5.00
3.43
3.60
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
5.00
Win
2.67
2.70
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and engaging campus facilities
  • +Excellent study laboratories and technology
  • +Supportive faculty
  • +Comprehensive business programs
  • +Experienced, professional tutors
  • +Modern facilities
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Welcoming and helpful atmosphere
  • +Freedom and opportunities for growth

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Expert professors and supportive campus environment
  • +Fosters creativity, critical thinking, and career readiness
  • +Modern facilities and vibrant culture
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Financial focus over educational quality
  • -Poor instructor qualifications
  • -Lack of student well-being consideration
  • -Outdated teaching methods and lack of practical application.
  • -Ineffective administrative and management support.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are problems.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptional marks across several key aspects, including facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and value, all receiving a perfect score. Its primary area for potential improvement lies in its internationality, which received a lower rating compared to other categories. Location also scored well, though not at the highest tier.

Assessments reveal a university with notable strengths in its **facilities**, which received a high rating. Conversely, **accommodation** emerged as the lowest-rated aspect, with **location** and **student life** also scoring below average. Other areas, including professors, internationality, and value, received moderate to good reviews, suggesting a mixed but generally solid experience, with notable room for improvement in practical student support and campus environment.

This institution achieves its highest marks in **Location** (4.1) and **Professors** (3.8). Its **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a rating of 2.7. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality are rated at a solid 3.5, while Value scores a respectable 3.6, indicating a generally positive, though not perfect, university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With overwhelmingly positive scores, this institution excels in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a perfect 5. **Accomodation** and **Internationality** also score highly at 4. The **Location** is the sole area that is less favorably rated, coming in at 3. The overall **Value** is rated exceptionally well at 5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The sole review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. This feedback highlights a welcoming atmosphere, a great campus with excellent facilities and tech, and strong faculty support.

~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong business programs and experienced lecturers. ~14% of feedback is negative, primarily concerning financial focus and instructor qualifications. The average rating is 3.43/5.

~60% of reviews are positive, highlighting freedom, professor support, and university atmosphere. ~10% of feedback expresses concerns about theory-based education and lack of practical experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university receives exceptional feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. One positive review highlights expert professors, modern facilities, a vibrant culture, and a safe, homey campus conducive to studying and growth.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
14%
30%
0%
0%
100%
4★
0%
43%
30%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
29%
30%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close