Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos - UNMSM vs Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola - USIL vs Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria - UNI vs Universidad César Vallejo - UCV vs Universidad de Piura - UDEP
Side-by-side comparison from 33 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +University prestige and academic rigor
- +Diverse student body and personal growth opportunities
- +Accessibility and good teachers
- +Strong international focus and global opportunities
- +Practical, entrepreneurship-driven programs
- +High-quality teaching and modern infrastructure
- +Strong academic rigor and critical thinking development
- +Supportive community and positive campus environment
- +Quality infrastructure and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and engaging professors
- +Affordable education and abundant opportunities
- +Inclusive and collaborative learning environment
- +Strong academic training with emphasis on values and ethics.
- +Welcoming and peaceful campus environment fostering nature and connection.
- +Inclusive community with diverse backgrounds and humanistic approach.
- +Academic excellence and international recognition
- +Highly qualified professors with real-world experience
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- -administrative and management issues
- -outdated facilities and technology
- -lack of support and communication
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a persistent problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Lack of responsive and helpful administrative support.
- -Inadequate and outdated campus facilities.
- -Unclear or inconsistent communication from faculty and administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
- -Communication and administrative issues often cause frustration.
- -Lack of student support and unclear academic expectations are prevalent complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
This institution presents a mixed but generally positive rating profile. Its strongest areas are Professor quality (4.33) and Value (4). Conversely, Accomodation (2.67) stands out as the weakest aspect. Ratings for Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Internationality are all in the moderate range, around 3.67.
This institution achieves an exceptional score of 5.0 for Internationality, its strongest area. Facilities also stand out with a high rating of 4.67. Conversely, Accommodation receives the lowest score at 4.0, representing its weakest point. Other areas like Professors, Student Life, and Value are rated consistently well at 4.5, with Location also scoring solidly at 4.17.
This institution demonstrates a robust offering, with its **Location** standing out as its strongest asset, earning a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, receiving a strong 4.5. Conversely, **Internationality** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, at 3.5. Other aspects like facilities, student life, accommodation, and value all received solid marks in the 4-4.5 range.
This institution presents a generally positive picture, excelling particularly in **Value** with a rating of 4.75 and strong marks for **Professors** (4.5) and **Student Life** (4.25). Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3. Other aspects like Facilities, Internationality, and Location fall within the good to very good range.
An impressive overall assessment reveals a university excelling across many facets. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional strengths in these core areas. The university also demonstrated solid value. However, its internationality score of 3.5 suggests this aspect could benefit from further development.
This institution presents a uniformly low rating across all assessed aspects, with no individual category demonstrating any particular strength. Areas including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received the lowest possible score, indicating a significant need for improvement in every dimension.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise the university's prestige, solid education, affordability, and opportunities to meet diverse people. Some mention frustrating bureaucracy and infrastructure limitations.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.89/5. Recurring themes include strong international opportunities, dual degree programs, and a focus on entrepreneurship and practical learning. No negative feedback was provided.
All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a high academic level, strong foundational knowledge, and a positive university experience with good facilities and a supportive environment.
All four reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the inclusive environment, knowledgeable and engaging professors, and ample academic and extracurricular opportunities. The university is also commended for its affordability and support for student success.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the integral training, high academic standards, and diverse extracurricular clubs. The peaceful, nature-filled campus and humanistic approach are also highlighted.
The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating. Universidad del Pacifico is praised for academic excellence and highly qualified professors. No negative feedback was provided.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
