Universidad Tecnológica del Perú - UTP vs Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista - UPSJB vs Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola - USIL vs Universidad de Piura - UDEP vs Universidad del Pacífico - UP
Side-by-side comparison from 26 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent technology and didactic teaching
- +Strong focus on professional and personal development
- +Positive peer relationships
- +Competitive and improving curriculum
- +Affordable tuition for medical studies
- +Strong international focus and global opportunities
- +Practical, entrepreneurship-driven programs
- +High-quality teaching and modern infrastructure
- +Strong academic training with emphasis on values and ethics.
- +Welcoming and peaceful campus environment fostering nature and connection.
- +Inclusive community with diverse backgrounds and humanistic approach.
- +Academic excellence and international recognition
- +Highly qualified professors with real-world experience
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of support and poor communication negatively impact student well-being.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling unsupported.
- -Lack of responsive and helpful administrative support.
- -Inadequate and outdated campus facilities.
- -Unclear or inconsistent communication from faculty and administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
- -Communication and administrative issues often cause frustration.
- -Lack of student support and unclear academic expectations are prevalent complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Nothing to show
This institution garners top marks across all evaluated aspects, achieving a perfect score of 5 in every category. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated exceptionally high. There are no apparent weaknesses, with the university demonstrating outstanding performance uniformly.
Across all surveyed categories, the institution received uniformly neutral ratings of zero. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or overall value. The consistent scoring suggests an average or unremarkable performance across every aspect evaluated.
This institution achieves an exceptional score of 5.0 for Internationality, its strongest area. Facilities also stand out with a high rating of 4.67. Conversely, Accommodation receives the lowest score at 4.0, representing its weakest point. Other areas like Professors, Student Life, and Value are rated consistently well at 4.5, with Location also scoring solidly at 4.17.
An impressive overall assessment reveals a university excelling across many facets. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional strengths in these core areas. The university also demonstrated solid value. However, its internationality score of 3.5 suggests this aspect could benefit from further development.
This institution presents a uniformly low rating across all assessed aspects, with no individual category demonstrating any particular strength. Areas including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received the lowest possible score, indicating a significant need for improvement in every dimension.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students highlight professional development and excellent laboratory technology. Clear and didactic teaching from professors is also a recurring theme.
With one review and an average rating of 4/5, feedback is predominantly positive (~100%). The positive review highlights a competitive curriculum and feasible pricing for medicine, while suggesting improvements in infrastructure.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.89/5. Recurring themes include strong international opportunities, dual degree programs, and a focus on entrepreneurship and practical learning. No negative feedback was provided.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the integral training, high academic standards, and diverse extracurricular clubs. The peaceful, nature-filled campus and humanistic approach are also highlighted.
The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating. Universidad del Pacifico is praised for academic excellence and highly qualified professors. No negative feedback was provided.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
