Universidad Tecnológica del Perú - UTP vs Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos - UNMSM vs Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista - UPSJB vs Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola - USIL vs Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria - UNI
Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent technology and didactic teaching
- +Strong focus on professional and personal development
- +Positive peer relationships
- +University prestige and academic rigor
- +Diverse student body and personal growth opportunities
- +Accessibility and good teachers
- +Competitive and improving curriculum
- +Affordable tuition for medical studies
- +Strong international focus and global opportunities
- +Practical, entrepreneurship-driven programs
- +High-quality teaching and modern infrastructure
- +Strong academic rigor and critical thinking development
- +Supportive community and positive campus environment
- +Quality infrastructure and experienced faculty
- +Career-focused curriculum and expert instructors
- +Professional and personal growth opportunities
- +Diverse programs and cultural immersion
- +Academic excellence and international recognition
- +Highly qualified professors with real-world experience
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are major concerns.
- -administrative and management issues
- -outdated facilities and technology
- -lack of support and communication
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of support and poor communication negatively impact student well-being.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a persistent problem.
- -Financial burden of tuition fees.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
- -Communication and administrative issues often cause frustration.
- -Lack of student support and unclear academic expectations are prevalent complaints.
This institution garners top marks across all evaluated aspects, achieving a perfect score of 5 in every category. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated exceptionally high. There are no apparent weaknesses, with the university demonstrating outstanding performance uniformly.
This institution presents a mixed but generally positive rating profile. Its strongest areas are Professor quality (4.33) and Value (4). Conversely, Accomodation (2.67) stands out as the weakest aspect. Ratings for Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Internationality are all in the moderate range, around 3.67.
Across all surveyed categories, the institution received uniformly neutral ratings of zero. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or overall value. The consistent scoring suggests an average or unremarkable performance across every aspect evaluated.
This institution achieves an exceptional score of 5.0 for Internationality, its strongest area. Facilities also stand out with a high rating of 4.67. Conversely, Accommodation receives the lowest score at 4.0, representing its weakest point. Other areas like Professors, Student Life, and Value are rated consistently well at 4.5, with Location also scoring solidly at 4.17.
This institution demonstrates a robust offering, with its **Location** standing out as its strongest asset, earning a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, receiving a strong 4.5. Conversely, **Internationality** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, at 3.5. Other aspects like facilities, student life, accommodation, and value all received solid marks in the 4-4.5 range.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in student life and location, both receiving high scores. Internationality and value are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation and facilities present areas for improvement, indicating these aspects are less favorably perceived by students. Overall, the institution appears to offer a positive experience, with specific categories requiring more attention.
This institution presents a uniformly low rating across all assessed aspects, with no individual category demonstrating any particular strength. Areas including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received the lowest possible score, indicating a significant need for improvement in every dimension.
With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students highlight professional development and excellent laboratory technology. Clear and didactic teaching from professors is also a recurring theme.
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise the university's prestige, solid education, affordability, and opportunities to meet diverse people. Some mention frustrating bureaucracy and infrastructure limitations.
With one review and an average rating of 4/5, feedback is predominantly positive (~100%). The positive review highlights a competitive curriculum and feasible pricing for medicine, while suggesting improvements in infrastructure.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.89/5. Recurring themes include strong international opportunities, dual degree programs, and a focus on entrepreneurship and practical learning. No negative feedback was provided.
All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a high academic level, strong foundational knowledge, and a positive university experience with good facilities and a supportive environment.
With a 4.22/5 average rating, ~89% of students praise diverse courses, excellent teachers, and strong career preparation. One review (~11%) mentions high tuition costs.
The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating. Universidad del Pacifico is praised for academic excellence and highly qualified professors. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show