Universidad Tecnológica del Perú - UTP vs Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos - UNMSM vs Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - PUCP vs Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola - USIL vs Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria - UNI

Side-by-side comparison from 26 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Tecnológica del Perú - UTP: wins 5/5 categories
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos - UNMSM: wins 0/5 categories
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - PUCP: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola - USIL: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria - UNI: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Ricardo Palma - URP: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad de San Martín de Porres - USMP: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Engineering
Best programme: Administration and Social Policy
Best programme: BCom in Management
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Architecture
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
3.00
4.25
4.67
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Location
5.00
3.67
3.75
4.17
5.00
Not rated
3.00
Professors
5.00
Win
4.33
4.75
4.50
4.50
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
5.00
3.67
4.50
5.00
3.50
Not rated
3.50
Student life
5.00
Win
3.67
4.50
4.50
4.00
Not rated
3.50
Value
5.00
Win
4.00
4.50
4.50
4.50
Not rated
3.50
Accommodation
5.00
Win
2.67
3.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent technology and didactic teaching
  • +Strong focus on professional and personal development
  • +Positive peer relationships
  • +University prestige and academic rigor
  • +Diverse student body and personal growth opportunities
  • +Accessibility and good teachers
  • +Rich cultural environment and diverse activities
  • +High quality of education and challenging academic programs
  • +Excellent campus facilities and resources
  • +Strong international focus and global opportunities
  • +Practical, entrepreneurship-driven programs
  • +High-quality teaching and modern infrastructure
  • +Strong academic rigor and critical thinking development
  • +Supportive community and positive campus environment
  • +Quality infrastructure and experienced faculty

Nothing to show

  • +Practical learning experiences and quality study programs
  • +Supportive and innovative teaching methods
  • +Good infrastructure and administrative support
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are major concerns.
  • -administrative and management issues
  • -outdated facilities and technology
  • -lack of support and communication
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling unsupported.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a persistent problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of transparency and communication regarding policies, procedures, and academic advising.
  • -Inadequate and outdated facilities, including insufficient study spaces and technology.
  • -Bureaucratic administrative processes and unresponsive staff.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners top marks across all evaluated aspects, achieving a perfect score of 5 in every category. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated exceptionally high. There are no apparent weaknesses, with the university demonstrating outstanding performance uniformly.

This institution presents a mixed but generally positive rating profile. Its strongest areas are Professor quality (4.33) and Value (4). Conversely, Accomodation (2.67) stands out as the weakest aspect. Ratings for Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Internationality are all in the moderate range, around 3.67.

This institution boasts excellent ratings, particularly in its **professors** (4.75) and **student life** (4.5), alongside strong scores for **internationality** and **value** (both 4.5). Facilities also receive a positive mark at 4.25. The primary area for improvement, however, lies with **accommodation**, scoring a lower 3, and **location** at 3.75.

This institution achieves an exceptional score of 5.0 for Internationality, its strongest area. Facilities also stand out with a high rating of 4.67. Conversely, Accommodation receives the lowest score at 4.0, representing its weakest point. Other areas like Professors, Student Life, and Value are rated consistently well at 4.5, with Location also scoring solidly at 4.17.

This institution demonstrates a robust offering, with its **Location** standing out as its strongest asset, earning a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, receiving a strong 4.5. Conversely, **Internationality** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, at 3.5. Other aspects like facilities, student life, accommodation, and value all received solid marks in the 4-4.5 range.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university presents a consistent performance across most aspects. Its strongest areas are the quality of its professors and a vibrant student life and international community, both receiving solid 4 and 3.5 ratings respectively. Conversely, facilities and accommodation are identified as areas for improvement, each scoring a 3. The university offers a fair value proposition, also rated at 3.5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students highlight professional development and excellent laboratory technology. Clear and didactic teaching from professors is also a recurring theme.

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise the university's prestige, solid education, affordability, and opportunities to meet diverse people. Some mention frustrating bureaucracy and infrastructure limitations.

Students praise the university's cultural richness, educational excellence, and diverse resources. The demanding curriculum is noted, fostering resilience. Some highlight the beautiful campus and ample student spaces.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.89/5. Recurring themes include strong international opportunities, dual degree programs, and a focus on entrepreneurship and practical learning. No negative feedback was provided.

All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a high academic level, strong foundational knowledge, and a positive university experience with good facilities and a supportive environment.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight strong communications programs, good study plans, and effective teaching. Areas for improvement include curriculum updates and expanded internship/job placement agreements.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
25%
20%
89%
100%
0%
0%
4★
0%
75%
80%
11%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close