Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU vs Satbayev University vs Turan University vs Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University vs University of Central Asia

Side-by-side comparison from 8 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Satbayev University (5.00)
Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU: wins 0/3 categories
Satbayev University: wins 2/3 categories
Turan University: wins 0/3 categories
Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University: wins 0/3 categories
University of Central Asia: wins 0/3 categories
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University - Mrs.: wins 0/3 categories
Narxoz University - Narxoz: wins 1/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Almaty, Kazakhstan
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Journalism
Best programme: International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Location
4.50
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Professors
4.50
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Internationality
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.25
4.00
Student life
4.50
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.25
5.00
Value
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Accommodation
4.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic foundation and competitive programming opportunities
  • +Strong academic programs and focus on practical skills
  • +International collaboration and exchange opportunities
  • +Opportunities for in-demand professions and research

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and experienced faculty
  • +Extensive program variety and robust infrastructure
  • +Valuable research opportunities and international collaboration
  • +Good professors and modern campus
  • +Strong support from the admission office
  • +Effective advertising and diverse student body
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible policies and lack of support are problematic.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and poor management are prevalent.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated teaching methods and materials are a significant concern.
  • -Students are frustrated with administrative and management issues.
  • -Lack of modern facilities and resources hinders the learning experience.
  • -Excessive administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of student support and resources.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves outstanding marks across nearly all aspects, with a perfect score in **Facilities** setting it apart. Student life, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. The university also presents a strong **Value** proposition at the same mark. With no significantly weak areas identified, the ratings paint a picture of a well-rounded and desirable educational environment.

Overall, this institution receives excellent marks, with a perfect score in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality, indicating a comprehensive and well-rounded experience. Accommodations represent the sole area for potential improvement, scoring a respectable but lower 4 out of 5. The university also scores a perfect 5 for Value, suggesting a strong return on investment for students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The institution receives particularly strong marks for its **location**, scoring a perfect 5. Student life is also highly regarded at 4.25, closely followed by the quality of professors at 4. Conversely, the university's **accommodation** stands out as a weaker area with a rating of 3, along with its facilities at 3.5. Internationality is moderately rated at 3.25, and the overall value is considered good at 4.

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation. Facilities and Internationality also receive strong ratings. However, the Value aspect stands out as the weakest, receiving a notably lower score compared to other categories, suggesting potential areas for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight strong programming foundations and active participation in competitive olympiads. No negative feedback was received.

With one review and an average rating of 5/5, this university is highly regarded. The feedback highlights excellent educational programs and international opportunities. Negative feedback is negligible, representing 0%.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.75/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive faculty, and good research. ~25% of feedback mentions a traditional learning approach.

With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good professors, a modern campus, and helpful admissions.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
4★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close