Almaty Technological University - ATU vs Turan University vs KIMEP University - KIMEP vs University of Central Asia vs Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University

Side-by-side comparison from 3 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Almaty Technological University - ATU: wins 0/5 categories
Turan University: wins 0/5 categories
KIMEP University - KIMEP: wins 2/5 categories
University of Central Asia: wins 0/5 categories
Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University: wins 0/5 categories
International Information Technologies University - IITU: wins 0/5 categories
Narxoz University - Narxoz: wins 3/5 categories
Comparing
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Economics and Management
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
1.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
Location
1.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
1.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
1.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
1.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Value
1.00
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
1.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and inspiring teaching
  • +Excellent career support and opportunities
  • +Strong sense of community and belonging

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging student community
  • +Accessible and approachable instructors

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Good professors and modern campus
  • +Strong support from the admission office
  • +Effective advertising and diverse student body
Cons
  • -Boring training system.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in course content is a recurring complaint.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of student support and resources.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a remarkably consistent performance across all assessed areas. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodation, received a top rating. Similarly, its location, internationality, and perceived value are all highlighted as exceptional. This suggests a comprehensively strong university experience with no particular weaknesses identified in this evaluation.

Nothing to show

This institution achieves high marks, particularly excelling in its prime **location** and vibrant **student life**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its **facilities** and **professors** are rated as areas with the most room for improvement, scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. Overall, the university presents a positive profile with strong showings in student experience and accessibility.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation. Facilities and Internationality also receive strong ratings. However, the Value aspect stands out as the weakest, receiving a notably lower score compared to other categories, suggesting potential areas for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The single review expressed strong dissatisfaction, with 100% of feedback being negative. The student found the university's training system boring and did not meet expectations, recommending against attendance.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. This single piece of feedback highlights good people, though it also mentions rising prices and some professors lacking competence.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good professors, a modern campus, and helpful admissions.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close