Almaty Technological University - ATU vs Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU vs Turan University vs KIMEP University - KIMEP vs Suleyman Demirel University

Side-by-side comparison from 69 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: KIMEP University - KIMEP (4.50)
Almaty Technological University - ATU: wins 0/3 categories
Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU: wins 3/3 categories
Turan University: wins 0/3 categories
KIMEP University - KIMEP: wins 0/3 categories
Suleyman Demirel University: wins 0/3 categories
Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University: wins 0/3 categories
Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Almaty, Kazakhstan
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Economics and Management
Best programme: Foreign Languages
Category ratings
Facilities
1.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.50
4.08
Not rated
Not rated
Location
1.00
4.50
Not rated
4.50
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
1.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.28
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
1.00
4.50
Not rated
4.50
2.97
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
1.00
4.50
Not rated
4.50
3.94
Not rated
Not rated
Value
1.00
4.50
Not rated
4.50
3.97
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
1.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.23
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and inspiring teaching
  • +Excellent career support and opportunities
  • +Strong sense of community and belonging
  • +Strong academic foundation and competitive programming opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging programs foster passion and develop essential skills.
  • +Positive peer relationships and community atmosphere are highly valued.
  • +Excellent campus facilities and modern learning environments
  • +Supportive and dedicated staff/faculty with engaging teaching
  • +Strong career support and employment opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Boring training system.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible policies and lack of support are problematic.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and course structure leads to confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication from staff are problems.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a remarkably consistent performance across all assessed areas. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodation, received a top rating. Similarly, its location, internationality, and perceived value are all highlighted as exceptional. This suggests a comprehensively strong university experience with no particular weaknesses identified in this evaluation.

This institution achieves outstanding marks across nearly all aspects, with a perfect score in **Facilities** setting it apart. Student life, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. The university also presents a strong **Value** proposition at the same mark. With no significantly weak areas identified, the ratings paint a picture of a well-rounded and desirable educational environment.

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong commendations, particularly in its location, student life, internationality, and value, all scoring a high 4.5. Accommodation is also well-regarded at 4. The academic staff are rated favorably at 4. The weakest area noted is facilities, which still achieve a solid 3.5 out of 5.

Overall, the university receives solid ratings across most aspects, with professors and location being standout strengths. Student life and value for money also perform well. However, accommodation and internationality present areas for improvement, receiving the lowest scores in the survey. Facilities are rated moderately.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The single review expressed strong dissatisfaction, with 100% of feedback being negative. The student found the university's training system boring and did not meet expectations, recommending against attendance.

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight strong programming foundations and active participation in competitive olympiads. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5 stars and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's journalism program for fostering a passion for storytelling and communication. A minor concern about rising tuition and some professor competence was outweighed by positive social experiences.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~81% of 64 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise excellent campus facilities and supportive staff. There are no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
50%
0%
50%
9%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
0%
50%
72%
0%
0%
3★
0%
50%
0%
0%
19%
0%
0%
2★
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close