Almaty Management University - ALMA vs Almaty Technological University - ATU vs Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University vs University of Central Asia vs Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University

Side-by-side comparison from 4 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Narxoz University - Narxoz (4.00)
Almaty Management University - ALMA: wins 1/5 categories
Almaty Technological University - ATU: wins 0/5 categories
Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University: wins 0/5 categories
University of Central Asia: wins 0/5 categories
Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University: wins 0/5 categories
International Information Technologies University - IITU: wins 0/5 categories
Narxoz University - Narxoz: wins 4/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Marketing and Advertising
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Almaty, Kazakhstan
4.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
Location
4.00
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
3.50
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
2.50
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
Student life
5.00
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Value
3.50
Win
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
1.00
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Experienced and engaging professors
  • +Practical, hands-on learning opportunities
  • +Engaging and inspiring teaching
  • +Excellent career support and opportunities
  • +Strong sense of community and belonging

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Good professors and modern campus
  • +Strong support from the admission office
  • +Effective advertising and diverse student body
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
  • -Boring training system.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of student support and resources.
Rating summary
What students say

Regarding university ratings, student life stands out as a significant strength, achieving a perfect score. Conversely, accommodation presents a notable weakness with a low rating. Other aspects like facilities, professors, and value are rated moderately. Location receives a strong positive score, while internationality is somewhat lower.

This institution demonstrates a remarkably consistent performance across all assessed areas. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodation, received a top rating. Similarly, its location, internationality, and perceived value are all highlighted as exceptional. This suggests a comprehensively strong university experience with no particular weaknesses identified in this evaluation.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation. Facilities and Internationality also receive strong ratings. However, the Value aspect stands out as the weakest, receiving a notably lower score compared to other categories, suggesting potential areas for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With one positive review and no negative feedback, the university receives an average rating of 3.5/5. This suggests a generally positive student experience, with ~50% of feedback being positive and ~0% negative.

The single review expressed strong dissatisfaction, with 100% of feedback being negative. The student found the university's training system boring and did not meet expectations, recommending against attendance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good professors, a modern campus, and helpful admissions.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close