Almaty Management University - ALMA vs Almaty Technological University - ATU vs Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU vs Turan University vs University of Central Asia

Side-by-side comparison from 6 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Almaty Management University - ALMA: wins 0/6 categories
Almaty Technological University - ATU: wins 0/6 categories
Kazakh-British Technical University - KBTU: wins 4/6 categories
Turan University: wins 0/6 categories
University of Central Asia: wins 0/6 categories
Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University: wins 0/6 categories
Narxoz University - Narxoz: wins 2/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Marketing and Advertising
Best programme: Computer Science
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
1.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.00
1.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
3.50
1.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
2.50
1.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
5.00
1.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Value
3.50
1.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
1.00
1.00
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Experienced and engaging professors
  • +Practical, hands-on learning opportunities
  • +Engaging and inspiring teaching
  • +Excellent career support and opportunities
  • +Strong sense of community and belonging
  • +Strong academic foundation and competitive programming opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Good professors and modern campus
  • +Strong support from the admission office
  • +Effective advertising and diverse student body
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
  • -Boring training system.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible policies and lack of support are problematic.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of student support and resources.
Rating summary
What students say

Regarding university ratings, student life stands out as a significant strength, achieving a perfect score. Conversely, accommodation presents a notable weakness with a low rating. Other aspects like facilities, professors, and value are rated moderately. Location receives a strong positive score, while internationality is somewhat lower.

This institution demonstrates a remarkably consistent performance across all assessed areas. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodation, received a top rating. Similarly, its location, internationality, and perceived value are all highlighted as exceptional. This suggests a comprehensively strong university experience with no particular weaknesses identified in this evaluation.

This institution achieves outstanding marks across nearly all aspects, with a perfect score in **Facilities** setting it apart. Student life, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. The university also presents a strong **Value** proposition at the same mark. With no significantly weak areas identified, the ratings paint a picture of a well-rounded and desirable educational environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation. Facilities and Internationality also receive strong ratings. However, the Value aspect stands out as the weakest, receiving a notably lower score compared to other categories, suggesting potential areas for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With one positive review and no negative feedback, the university receives an average rating of 3.5/5. This suggests a generally positive student experience, with ~50% of feedback being positive and ~0% negative.

The single review expressed strong dissatisfaction, with 100% of feedback being negative. The student found the university's training system boring and did not meet expectations, recommending against attendance.

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight strong programming foundations and active participation in competitive olympiads. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good professors, a modern campus, and helpful admissions.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
50%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close