Universidad Abierta Interamericana - UAI vs Tbilisi State Medical University - TSSU vs State University of New York at Fredonia - SUNY Fredonia vs State Academy of Fine Arts of Armenia vs Akaki Tsereteli State University

Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Akaki Tsereteli State University (5.00)
Universidad Abierta Interamericana - UAI: wins 2/2 categories
Tbilisi State Medical University - TSSU: wins 0/2 categories
State University of New York at Fredonia - SUNY Fredonia: wins 0/2 categories
State Academy of Fine Arts of Armenia: wins 0/2 categories
Akaki Tsereteli State University: wins 0/2 categories
Alte University: wins 0/2 categories
Kutaisi International University - KIU: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Audiovisual Communication
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Art History
Best programme: Medicine
Tbilisi, Georgia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
3.33
2.00
3.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
4.06
1.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
5.00
3.83
3.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
4.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
3.76
1.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
5.00
3.67
2.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
3.50
1.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible and career-focused with internship/work opportunities
  • +Supportive environment for academic and career guidance
  • +Wide range of specialization options
  • +Expert and supportive faculty
  • +Affordable tuition and quality education
  • +Balanced academic and holistic development

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse and proper educational programs across various fields
  • +Essential artistic knowledge provision
  • +Affordable tuition costs and high educational standards
  • +International recognition and diverse student body
  • +Focus on English language programs

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of practical work and real-life experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and unclear communication frustrate students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent scores across most aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. Student life is the sole area receiving a slightly lower, yet still strong, rating of 4.

This institution excels in its location, receiving the highest rating. Student life and internationality also score well. However, the facilities are its weakest point, with the lowest rating among all categories. Accommodations and overall value represent solid mid-range scores, with professors also receiving a favorable review.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates a notably strong performance in **Student Life** and **Value**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are areas that could be improved, scoring a moderate 3. Other aspects, including **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, fall within a solid, positive range.

Remarkably high marks were awarded across several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Student Life all achieved a perfect score of 5. Areas such as Accomodation, Internationality, and Value were also well-regarded, each receiving a score of 4. This indicates a generally strong offering, with a few minor opportunities for improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are positive, highlighting accessible career paths and helpful staff. The remaining ~33% of feedback is not negative.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 18 reviews, ~78% are positive, praising expert faculty, supportive community, and effective learning structures. A small portion of feedback (~5.6%) expresses concerns about practical experience and knowledge acquisition.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the university is praised for its wide range of study programs and thorough artistic education. No negative feedback was recorded.

This university receives a perfect 5/5 rating based on one review. The feedback highlights the institution's state funding, international recognition, and affordable tuition, offering a high standard of education and prioritizing English language programs. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
33%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
33%
44%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
33%
17%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

TSMU is a place with an abundance of knowledge!

It is a very friendly place and makes learning very effortless. The teachers are very helpful too Our practical classes have been conducive and they provide extra lessons to build our confidence. Lots of cultural events also take place to balance our hectic schedules.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close