Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador - UPEL vs Western Mindanao State University - WMSU vs Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University - ZPPSU vs Tamale College of Education - TACE vs PATTS College of Aeronautics - PATTS

Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University - ZPPSU (5.00)
Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador - UPEL: wins 0/5 categories
Western Mindanao State University - WMSU: wins 0/5 categories
Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University - ZPPSU: wins 5/5 categories
Tamale College of Education - TACE: wins 0/5 categories
PATTS College of Aeronautics - PATTS: wins 0/5 categories
Southern City Colleges: wins 0/5 categories
Royal College of Physicians of Ireland: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Education Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
Best programme: Engineering of Computing Systems
Best programme: Education
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Zamboanga City, Philippines
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
3.00
5.00
Win
2.00
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
5.00
Not rated
4.00
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.50
5.00
Win
1.00
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
2.50
5.00
Win
1.00
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
5.00
4.50
5.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Specialized education and teacher training
  • +Good organization and development of programs
  • +Affordable cost and accessible facilities
  • +Emphasis on creativity and critical thinking
  • +Cultivation of resilience and character development
  • +Rigorous academic programs and dedicated professors
  • +Practical, real-world application and specialization
  • +Conducive and bright environment.
  • +Proper movement layout.
  • +High-quality aeronautical education and facilities
  • +Spacious campus and classrooms
  • +Strong organizational support and teamwork

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -A lack of engagement and support from instructors is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent disruptions.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of support and resources hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff causes dissatisfaction.
  • -Unclear communication and unresponsive administration lead to frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Limited career support and irrelevant course content disappoint students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels particularly in its **location** and **student life**, both receiving perfect scores. The quality of **professors**, **accommodation**, and overall **value** are also strong, all earning a 4. Conversely, **facilities** are the weakest area at a 3, with **internationality** also scoring moderately at 3.5.

This institution receives outstanding marks for its **location (5)**, **professors (4.5)**, and **student life (4.5)**, alongside a strong showing for **value (4.5)**. **Accommodation (4)** is also well-regarded. However, **internationality (2.5)** presents a notable area for improvement, and **facilities (3)**, while adequate, are not a standout feature.

Across several key metrics, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received perfect scores. The sole area of concern is the location, which was rated at zero, indicating it is a significant drawback compared to its otherwise excellent offerings.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location** and **student life**, both receiving a high rating of 4. Furthermore, its **value** is also rated positively at 4. Conversely, the university faces challenges in **professors** and **internationality**, both scoring a low 1. **Facilities** and **accommodation** fall within the mid-range with scores of 2 and 3 respectively.

Internationality stands out as the university's strongest area, receiving a rating of 4.33. Student life also scores well at 4.0. Conversely, Facilities, Professors, and Value are the weakest areas, all rated at 3.33. Location and Accomodation fall in the middle with scores of 3.67.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise UPEL for its focus on teacher training, valuable knowledge gained for professional growth, and affordable costs. Facilities and organization are also highlighted positively.

With 2 positive reviews out of 4, the university is generally well-regarded. Students highlight learning resilience and creativity. There were no negative reviews.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university program is highly praised. Students highlight its strong focus on efficient water use, sustainability, and practical fieldwork, preparing them for real-world challenges.

The sole review praises the college's conducive environment and proper layout. With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive.

With a 3.67 average rating, the university garners positive feedback (~100%) regarding its aeronautical facilities and educational standards. Students also appreciate the spacious campus and supportive organizations.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
40%
0%
100%
0%
33%
0%
0%
4★
60%
50%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
50%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

About my Alma Mater

Good day! As a Nursing graduate from this university, I can say that this institution, which is government-funded, provides quality education that makes it a home of competent students and achievers. Needless to say, the administration down to the faculty members genuinely impart their broad knowledge in the field of their expertise and experiences to their students, which greatly impacts the future of the students. However, there are some points that I also need to stress out for this university to be known as well-equipped and highly-developed institution. I would recommend that the administration improve the learning facilities and equipment of the university. The chairs, rooms, and learning paraphernalia should be improved to make it conducive for learning. It is also time for the administration to adapt a modern and highly innovative technologies so that this university will level up with those universities that provide excellent quality education and training. To sum up, I would still recommend this institution to all students especially to those who prefer low cost tuition fees but can gain exemplary basic education, skills, and knowledge.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Great Starting Ground for Aviation

This is a great starting ground for aviation. The staff and personnel were friendly. One of the cons in this school is that the professors doesn't teach very well and give expensive projects. Also, what i don't like about this school are the enrollment process, poor facilities and lack of equipment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close