Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD vs University College Lahore vs Superior University vs Lahore Garrison University vs CMH Lahore Medical College

Side-by-side comparison from 15 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD (5.00)
Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD: wins 1/2 categories
University College Lahore: wins 1/2 categories
Superior University: wins 0/2 categories
Lahore Garrison University: wins 0/2 categories
CMH Lahore Medical College: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Fashion
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Lahore, Pakistan
3.90
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Best programme: Physiotherapy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
Win
4.00
4.13
3.50
3.00
Location
4.00
3.50
3.38
5.00
5.00
Professors
5.00
5.00
4.50
4.50
5.00
Internationality
4.00
4.50
Win
3.75
3.50
3.00
Student life
5.00
3.50
4.00
4.00
5.00
Value
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
3.63
3.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and inclusive environment with excellent learning opportunities
  • +Highly valued graduates in the market
  • +Top choice for fashion design and related programs
  • +Quality education and diverse programmes
  • +Supportive environment and extracurriculars
  • +Adequate resources for specific fields
  • +Cooperative and qualified faculty
  • +Career growth focus and practical learning
  • +Positive campus environment
  • +Excellent IT and Computer Science programs
  • +Strong career outcomes and job placement
  • +Positive campus environment with good facilities and active societies
  • +High affiliation and accreditation
  • +Modern campus and facilities
  • +Qualified and experienced faculty
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are lacking or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Illiterate, unethical, and unprofessional staff is a significant concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of support are recurring problems.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its professors and student life. Facilities and value for money are also highly regarded. The university presents a solid offering in terms of accommodation and internationality, though its location, while good, is rated slightly lower than other aspects.

Performance across various university aspects reveals a strong academic focus, with professors receiving the highest rating of 5. Facilities and accommodation are well-regarded, both scoring 4, complemented by an excellent internationality score of 4.5. Value for money also stands out with a rating of 4.5. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are location and student life, each rated at 3.5.

An analysis of the university's ratings reveals exceptional strengths in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring a perfect 4.5. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also received commendable scores. Conversely, **Location** emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.375. Other categories like **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Student Life** fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally positive student experience with a standout academic and financial offering, offset by the geographical setting.

An examination of the university's ratings reveals a strong emphasis on its prime **location**, scoring a perfect 5. Professors also received high marks at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement include **accommodation**, which received a score of 3, representing the lowest rating. Other aspects such as student life, internationality, and value fall within a solid range, indicating a generally well-rounded institution.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its faculty expertise, campus location, and vibrant student life, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, areas such as facilities and accommodation are rated moderately, indicating room for improvement. Internationality also sits at a moderate level. Overall, the university offers good value, reflected in its solid four-star rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 5/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for fashion programs, citing supportive staff and excellent learning opportunities that lead to market-valued graduates.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, the university is highly praised. Reviews highlight quality education, diverse degree options, and various extracurricular activities. Engineering students specifically note adequate lab equipment and qualified faculty.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting cooperative, well-qualified teachers, a focus on career growth, and practical learning. One negative review criticized staff qualifications.

With a 4/5 average rating from two reviews, feedback is ~100% positive. Students praise well-educated teachers, good courses, and campus facilities, particularly for IT programs. Event organizations and student societies are also highlighted positively.

The single review is highly positive, awarding 4/5 stars. This feedback highlights strong affiliations, modern facilities, and qualified faculty, with no negative points raised.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
50%
38%
0%
0%
4★
0%
50%
38%
100%
100%
3★
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

University management and staff

It is very sad to say that one of the best Pakistan institutes of education has such illiterate, unethical and stupid staff in its university. They need to hire qualified staff, so that they can maintain their good standing.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close