Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD vs Forman Christian College vs Superior University vs Lahore Garrison University vs National College of Business Administration and Economics

Side-by-side comparison from 33 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD (5.00)
Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD: wins 4/7 categories
Forman Christian College: wins 2/7 categories
Superior University: wins 0/7 categories
Lahore Garrison University: wins 1/7 categories
National College of Business Administration and Economics: wins 0/7 categories
Lahore Leads University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Fashion
Best programme: Business and Marketing
Lahore, Pakistan
3.90
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
Win
4.29
4.13
3.50
3.00
3.00
Location
4.00
4.63
3.38
5.00
Win
3.67
3.00
Professors
5.00
Win
4.59
4.50
4.50
3.67
4.00
Internationality
4.00
4.06
Win
3.75
3.50
2.67
1.00
Student life
5.00
Win
4.59
4.00
4.00
3.00
3.00
Value
4.50
4.53
Win
4.50
4.00
3.33
4.00
Accommodation
4.00
Win
3.75
3.63
3.00
2.67
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and inclusive environment with excellent learning opportunities
  • +Highly valued graduates in the market
  • +Top choice for fashion design and related programs
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive faculty.
  • +Lively campus life and extracurricular opportunities.
  • +Emphasis on critical thinking and practical learning.
  • +Cooperative and qualified faculty
  • +Career growth focus and practical learning
  • +Positive campus environment
  • +Excellent IT and Computer Science programs
  • +Strong career outcomes and job placement
  • +Positive campus environment with good facilities and active societies
  • +Expert faculty & outcome-based education
  • +Engaging professors & strong class participation
  • +Cooperative administration & good infrastructure

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are lacking or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hindered learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff was a problem.
  • -Illiterate, unethical, and unprofessional staff is a significant concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor student-teacher communication and lack of career counseling.
  • -Limited co-curricular activities and a general lack of student engagement opportunities.
  • -Unhelpful faculty members, with very few exceptions.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its professors and student life. Facilities and value for money are also highly regarded. The university presents a solid offering in terms of accommodation and internationality, though its location, while good, is rated slightly lower than other aspects.

This institution receives particularly high marks in several key areas. Its location and professors are lauded as exceptionally strong points, closely followed by student life and value. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest rated aspect, while facilities and internationality also show room for improvement.

An analysis of the university's ratings reveals exceptional strengths in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring a perfect 4.5. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also received commendable scores. Conversely, **Location** emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.375. Other categories like **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Student Life** fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally positive student experience with a standout academic and financial offering, offset by the geographical setting.

An examination of the university's ratings reveals a strong emphasis on its prime **location**, scoring a perfect 5. Professors also received high marks at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement include **accommodation**, which received a score of 3, representing the lowest rating. Other aspects such as student life, internationality, and value fall within a solid range, indicating a generally well-rounded institution.

This university shows a mixed performance in its ratings. Its strongest areas are Professors and Location, both scoring an average of 3.67. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality are its weakest points, each receiving a score of 2.67. Facilities and Student Life also averaged a moderate 3, while Value sits slightly above average at 3.33.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 5/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for fashion programs, citing supportive staff and excellent learning opportunities that lead to market-valued graduates.

Nearly all reviews are positive, with students praising the strong academic reputation, supportive faculty, and lively campus. Approximately 0% of feedback expressed concerns.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting cooperative, well-qualified teachers, a focus on career growth, and practical learning. One negative review criticized staff qualifications.

With a 4/5 average rating from two reviews, feedback is ~100% positive. Students praise well-educated teachers, good courses, and campus facilities, particularly for IT programs. Event organizations and student societies are also highlighted positively.

Around 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting good faculty, infrastructure, and an engaging learning environment. Approximately 33% of feedback mentioned unhelpful faculty and a lack of career counseling and co-curricular activities.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
71%
38%
0%
33%
0%
4★
0%
24%
38%
100%
33%
0%
3★
0%
6%
13%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
13%
0%
33%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

University management and staff

It is very sad to say that one of the best Pakistan institutes of education has such illiterate, unethical and stupid staff in its university. They need to hire qualified staff, so that they can maintain their good standing.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close