Arab International University - AIU vs Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management - NSUEM vs Queensland University of Technology vs International University for Science and Technology vs IMM Graduate School

Side-by-side comparison from 17 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Arab International University - AIU: wins 2/4 categories
Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management - NSUEM: wins 0/4 categories
Queensland University of Technology: wins 1/4 categories
International University for Science and Technology: wins 0/4 categories
IMM Graduate School: wins 1/4 categories
University of Sriwijaya - Unsri: wins 0/4 categories
African Methodist Episcopal University - AMEU : wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Best programme: International Business
Durban, South Africa
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Marketing
Best programme: International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Not rated
4.54
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.00
Not rated
4.62
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.62
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.38
Not rated
4.50
3.00
Not rated
Student life
5.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Value
5.00
Not rated
4.46
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
4.50
Win
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated and supportive teachers
  • +Modern facilities and resources
  • +Appealing campus aesthetics

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive environment and accessible, expert faculty.
  • +Real-world relevant assignments and hands-on learning.
  • +Welcoming campus and diverse opportunities for growth.

Nothing to show

  • +Experienced and qualified tutors
  • +Flexible study options allowing work-life balance
  • +Relevant and competitive course modules
  • +Diverse and supportive student community
  • +Strong academic environment

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Teaching quality and course content are sometimes disappointing.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication create frustration.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor communication and administrative problems are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a consistent complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or not well-suited to industry needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary stress and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leads to confusion and unmet expectations.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Exceptional scores are evident across several key areas. The institution shines with perfect ratings for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Internationality, indicating a well-rounded and highly desirable environment. Value is also rated perfectly, suggesting strong return on investment. The Location and Accommodation aspects, while still good, are the weakest areas with a rating of 4, though they remain positive.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates excellent performance in several key areas. Professors and location received exceptionally high scores, closely followed by facilities and value. Student life and internationality also scored well. However, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a notably lower rating compared to other aspects.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional ratings, particularly excelling in its facilities and overall value, both receiving a perfect score. Student life, location, accommodation, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring 4 or 4.5 out of 5. The professors are the lowest-rated area, though still solid with a 4, indicating a generally positive and well-rounded university experience.

This institution garners excellent scores in student life and value, both receiving a perfect 5. Facilities, professors, and location are also strong, each scoring a solid 4. Accommodations and internationality represent the weaker areas, with ratings of 3. Overall, the university offers a highly positive experience, particularly in its vibrant student community and perceived worth.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being highly satisfied. Students highlight excellent teachers, modern facilities, and attentive support.

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, averaging 4.54/5 from 13 feedback entries. Students highlight supportive faculties, practical/real-world assignments, and convenient campus locations with modern facilities. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

With a 5/5 average rating from two reviews, students praise the university for qualified tutors and flexible study options that allow balancing life and work. There is no negative feedback.

With one review, the average rating is 4/5 stars. This single positive review highlights a supportive academic environment and diverse student body across two campuses. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
0%
54%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
46%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close