Ahmad Dahlan University - UAD vs University of Sanata Dharma vs STIKes Madani vs Indonesian Nuclear Technology Polytechnic - Poltek Nuklir vs Duta Wacana Christian University - DWCU

Side-by-side comparison from 7 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Ahmad Dahlan University - UAD: wins 0/4 categories
University of Sanata Dharma: wins 0/4 categories
STIKes Madani: wins 0/4 categories
Indonesian Nuclear Technology Polytechnic - Poltek Nuklir: wins 0/4 categories
Duta Wacana Christian University - DWCU: wins 0/4 categories
University of Amikom Yogyakarta - AMIKOM: wins 0/4 categories
SMKN 6 Yogyakarta: wins 4/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Management
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Midwifery
Best programme: Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Tourism
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.25
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.50
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.50
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.25
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
3.50
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent academic foundation and personal growth opportunities.
  • +Supportive and dynamic lecturer-student interaction.
  • +Strong Islamic religious curriculum alongside formal education.

Nothing to show

  • +Islamic integration with healthcare courses
  • +Quranic memorization and Arabic language requirements
  • +Strong academic programs in nuclear technology
  • +Student-friendly environment in Yogyakarta
  • +Excellent laboratory facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Hands-on practical learning
  • +Supportive and helpful teachers
  • +Good facilities and resources
Cons
  • -Students are frustrated by administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
  • -There is widespread dissatisfaction with outdated facilities and a lack of resources.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or unengaging.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a consistent concern.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is frustrating for students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective or unengaging teaching methods are a common complaint.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
Rating summary
What students say

An institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its facilities, professors, and international appeal, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Student life and location also score well at 4.25. However, the university's value proposition registers as a comparative weakness, with a rating of 3.5, while accommodation sits at a respectable 4.

Nothing to show

This institution receives excellent marks for its professors and overall value, both earning a perfect score. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are also strong, each rated at a solid four. Internationality is the area with the lowest rating, coming in at a three. This indicates a generally positive experience with notable strengths in teaching quality and affordability.

Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution shines particularly brightly in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving top marks. Student life and accommodation are also highly rated, suggesting a positive campus environment. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and internationality, which received moderate scores. The overall value proposition appears strong.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives perfect scores across all evaluated metrics. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a 5 out of 5. There are no discernible weak areas; every aspect surveyed meets the highest possible standard.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 100% positive reviews, students report transformative experiences and strong academic/personal growth. They highlight enjoyable studies, effective teaching, and dynamic lecturer-student interaction.

Nothing to show

With one review, the average rating is 4/5. Positive feedback (100%) highlights programs that integrate Islamic learning with academic courses like midwifery, nursing, and pharmacy, including mandatory Quran memorization and Arabic language.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, this university garners high praise for its student-friendly environment and strong academic programs. Positive comments highlight excellent laboratory facilities and specialized nuclear-related education.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. It highlights extensive learning, enjoyable hands-on practice, and helpful, nice teachers.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
100%
4★
75%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close