Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina vs Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC vs Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia - UNAD vs Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL

Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina (5.00)
Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC: wins 1/6 categories
Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina: wins 3/6 categories
Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia - UNAD: wins 1/6 categories
Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL: wins 0/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administracion - CESA: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Science (Recreation and Sports Management)
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: BA (hons) Psychology
Best programme: Graphic Engineering and Design
Category ratings
Facilities
4.60
4.67
Win
4.20
4.33
2.33
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.00
4.67
Win
3.40
4.33
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.67
4.67
4.60
4.40
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.67
Win
3.67
3.20
4.00
2.33
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.20
4.67
Win
4.00
4.50
2.67
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.17
4.33
4.40
Win
4.00
2.67
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
3.67
3.60
4.67
Win
2.33
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality and standards
  • +Flexible study options and time management
  • +Committed and qualified professors
  • +Quality programs and affordable tuition
  • +Practical experience and real-world application
  • +Career advancement opportunities and international agreements
  • +Strong economics, law, and political science programs
  • +Excellent preparation for the labor market
  • +University prestige and history
  • +Supportive and caring staff offering detailed explanations.
  • +Emphasis on self-reliance and critical thinking in learning.
  • +Flexible online learning options with advanced technological resources.
  • +quality faculty and student programs
  • +good location

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of effective communication and student support is a problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.

The university receives exceptionally strong feedback in several key areas, with facilities, professors, location, and student life all earning near-perfect scores. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present as comparatively weaker aspects, scoring notably lower. The value for money is also rated favorably, though not as highly as the top-tier categories.

Professors receive the highest marks, reflecting a strong academic core. Facilities and value also score well, indicating a positive learning environment and good return on investment. However, location and internationality present opportunities for improvement, with lower scores in these areas. Student life and accommodation fall within the middle range of ratings.

This institution receives consistently high marks, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.5. **Value** and **Internationality** are the lowest-rated areas, though still solid at 4.0. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, and Location also demonstrate strong performance, with ratings around 4.3 to 4.4, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.

Academically, the university excels, with professors receiving an exceptionally high rating of 4.33. However, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a low 2.33. Student life and value for money are also mid-range, while location sits at a neutral 3. The university's internationality also scored similarly low at 2.33.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.

All reviews are positive (100%), highlighting quality study programs, affordability, and enriching experiences. Students appreciate transformative programs, skilled teachers, and practical application opportunities. The university also fosters business sector support and international specialization agreements.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students praise rigorous economics and law programs, excellent professional preparation, and the university's prestige. No negative feedback was received.

Students report a highly positive experience (~100% of feedback), praising strong organizational support, attentive staff, and engaging learning methods. Some minor navigation and response time issues were noted.

With an average rating of 3.67/5, reviews indicate positive aspects like good teachers and program offerings. A minor point concerns the availability of study and sports spaces, and outdated computer equipment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
86%
100%
83%
80%
33%
0%
0%
4★
14%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
17%
0%
67%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Unad

This university offers 100% online education programs, which allows people like me who for some reason must stay home. However, I believe there is little support, no virtual classes, and in most cases, students must do everything alone.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close