University of Applied Sciences - HTW Berlin vs Bauman Moscow State Technical University - BMSTU vs Kwara State Polytechnic - Kwara poly vs DeBroc vs Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies
Side-by-side comparison from 240 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive environment and academic resources
- +Vibrant campus life and social engagement
- +Opportunities for personal growth and development
- +Robust engineering fundamentals and academic rigor.
- +Supportive and responsive administration and faculty.
- +Established university reputation and strong student support.
- +Supportive, goal-driven professors and good balance of theory and practical learning
- +Positive academic environment with adequate facilities and no cultism/strikes
- +Opportunities for personal growth and future preparation
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs with interdisciplinary focus
- +Excellent professors and practical knowledge
- +High reputation and valuable networking opportunities
- +Strong discipline and consistent academic calendar
- +Principled lecturers and moral development
- +Conducive learning environment
- +High-quality, well-structured curriculum with practical, real-world applications.
- +Supportive learning environment with flexible pacing.
- +Emphasis on moral values and ethical development.
- -Poor quality instruction and unhelpful teachers
- -Lack of administrative and management support
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
- -Course content and teaching methods lack relevance and engagement.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities and resources.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum that doesn't prepare students for the future.
Nothing to show
- -Excessive tuition fees and poor value for money.
- -Ineffective and insensitive administrative and support services.
- -Unprofessional and judgmental staff.
- -Lack of personalized and engaging educational approach.
- -Outdated facilities and transportation issues.
- -Disciplinary measures like strict dress codes.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources frustrate students.
- -Ineffective teaching and unclear curriculum are frequent complaints.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback with its strongest area being **Internationality**, scoring 4.19. Student life also performs well at 4.04. Areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, ratings include **Facilities** at 3.91 and **Accomodation** at 3.88. Professors, location, and value all received a solid 4 or close to it, indicating a well-rounded student experience.
This institution garners outstanding marks in several key areas, including facilities, location, and overall value, all receiving a perfect score of 5. Student life also scored highly at 5. While professors and accommodation were well-regarded with a score of 4, internationality emerged as a comparatively weaker area with a rating of 3.
This institution achieves a commendable overall standing, with location and value emerging as its strongest attributes, both scoring above 4.4. Student life and accommodation are areas that present opportunities for improvement, with ratings of 4 and 3.8 respectively. Other aspects, including facilities, professors, and internationality, fall within a solid, positive range, contributing to a generally favorable university experience.
Nothing to show
Academic excellence stands out, with a high rating for professors. Location and internationality also received positive marks. However, student life and accommodation were identified as areas needing improvement, indicated by lower scores. Facilities and overall value fall somewhere in the middle, suggesting a mixed but generally positive perception of the university's offerings.
A varied profile emerges from the university's ratings, with its strongest area being **Value** at 4.31. **Professors** also received a commendable score of 4.21. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.62, closely followed by **Facilities** at 3.74. Other categories like Location, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate to good range, reflecting a generally positive but not uniformly exceptional performance.
This institution demonstrates a strong showing in several key areas, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving a commendable 4 out of 5. The university also scores well in **Location**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Value**, all rated at a solid 3.5. Its **Facilities** stand as the weakest point, though still receiving a respectable 3.5.
Approximately 98% of reviews are positive, highlighting enjoyable campus life, supportive environments, modern facilities, and ample opportunities for social engagement and personal development. A small amount of negative feedback points to inconsistent teaching quality and interpersonal issues.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students praised the in-depth engineering fundamentals and knowledgeable professors, as well as responsive administration and support for student initiatives.
With 100% positive feedback from 17 reviews and an average rating of 4.59/5, students praise good professors, practical learning, and a disciplined, safe environment. Some mention slow administrative processes and a need for improved departmental facilities.
Nothing to show
With a 3/5 average rating, reviews show ~33% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight theoretical/practical knowledge and reputation, while negative feedback points to high tuition and unhelpful administrative support.
With 159 reviews, ~82% highlight top-notch discipline, consistency, and a stable academic calendar. A small ~1.3% of feedback mentioned a lack of personalized attention and some facility issues.
With a 4.5/5 average rating from two reviews, Al-Hikmah University is recognized for quality education and a positive learning environment. Positive feedback highlights strong academic programs and moral values. No negative reviews were provided.
Project management teacher fails people and tells them straight into their face it’s because she doesn’t like them. The Law teacher had us do presentations and didn’t even do one single class in a year. Ethics teacher claims that women deserve to get sexually assaulted if their dress is an inch too short. The Economics teacher does not speak English even though the major is taught in it. Half the students are internationals without German coming to Berlin to study, yet most “International” subjects are talking only about Germany and giving presentations in German. There is nothing applied about this university, it is all old theory. Marketing classes did not even include advertising, social media, digital media or anything more relevant in the past decade. Same for other subjects. The administration is disorganised. The international student office is always on holidays and never replies. The administration does not answer at all until you send your e-mails to their bosses. Due to the error OF THE ADMINISTRATION, they did not want to count my two semesters abroad until I fought them for seven months and emailed everyone at school when suddenly it was a matter of one document. One thesis supervisor steals his students' work for his own publications and has plenty of lawsuits. The other master’s supervisor did not answer any of the e-mails during the writing, except for one which said ‘I don’t know, google it”. There is so much more I could say. This school is a disaster and if you are reading this review DO NOT GO HERE, they really don’t care about their students. Neither does the school administration, nor the teachers. If at least one person decides not to go there due to this review I already did a good deed. Try HWR, Free University, Humboldt, or anything else. It was a horrible experience that made me not want to continue educating myself for at least a few years until I can forget all those horrible moments and people (except some single people and students)
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The Graduate Institute Geneva (IHEID) is one of the worst educational institutions in Switzerland. It's important to dive into the specifics as to why. When it comes to a master’s degree in Switzerland, tuition ranges from 500–2,000 Swiss francs, however, IHEID charges foreign students a whopping 8,000 Swiss francs. While you may argue that American universities charge more and so therefore this is a bargain, you would be dumbfounded to experience some of the educational conditions in comparison to American universities. • Scholarships: For over a decade, IHEID has shown no transparency on its scholarships. At this point, it can be assumed that something terribly wrong is going on behind the scene, as they have refused to show how many scholarship packages are provided but have justified an increase in tuition in this manner. IHEID has been audited by so many governmental agencies it reeks of fraudulent governance. The institute has been financially audited, its governance has been audited, even its sexual harassment mechanism has been audited. • Student Representation: The Institute has been called out for a lack of student involvement for years, going far as appearing in front of state officials to plead their case. It is clear however that the new director enjoys this level of student participation as she cancelled her meetings with the student association for over 3 months this past 2021 summer, to punish them, for an article that was written in the independent student press. She has called members of the association intimidating and harassing when they have advocated for better housing services. The trauma some members of the association have faced has pushed them into depression, and psychotic breaks. Alumni of the association have experienced these tactics throughout generations and is an integral part of the IHEID student association experience. • Sexual and Moral Harassment: IHEID Senior administrators have been accused of sexual harassment for over ten years, while the directrice herself has recently been accused of intimidating and threatening members of the Student Association, IHEID student journalists and independent advocates. IHEID’s most valuable asset isn't its students, but its reputation and anyone that attempts to bring anything to light is disposable. As a 2014 article states, if you do not like the Institute, you can leave”. • Career Services: As a foreign student, Switzerland is a distinctively difficult country to migrate to. You are effectively competing against the Swiss/permanent residents, and then Europeans as they are legally prioritized in terms of visas. Unless you are in one of those situations, your status will be considered a third-country national (Asians, Africans, Americans). How is it them that career services only have 1–2 people on staff for a 1000 student institution? Furthermore, the IHEID does not recognize institutional racism, and it, therefore, does not provide resistance techniques to counter these policies. • No skill-based centres: Where American universities may have writing centres, IHEID does not make any effort to close the academic gap between students whose language isn't English or may have studied in another language in their bachelors. You also do not have any math, Econ, or stats centre to gain help or tutoring when needed. • The Interdisciplinary program: Additionally, if you happened to have chosen the Masters in International Development, you will soon notice that you are actually not learning much. The quality of the core courses is far below the quality promised. Essentially, you are buying a degree and you do not need to invest too much time or effort into your courses. It is also not expected; Professors in the Interdisciplinary program do not connect with you in the same way other program professors do. Actually, the program is referred to as the Cash Cow of the Institute by professors themselves. This program will not teach you IR concepts, the bare minimum of political science, such as you would in a government 101 class. ○ Students Background: Since there are no IR or Policy sci requirements to enter this program, your peers can have studied biology or English literature. This will impact the level of academic rigour you will be exposed to. • Teaching Assistants: Their salaries have not been increased in over 7 years. When they sign their contracts they are not shown internal regulations or teaching staff regulations. They are not only the least paid in the entire country when recently told they may get a raise, but their social benefits such as unemployment are also significantly reduced. The manner in which they are treated those not encourage master students to rely on them for academic support. IHEID’s priority is to build its reputation on the backs of students, particularly students of diversity. The Institute counts on students’ ties with the institution to avoid improving its services. As a student whose visa is associated with the school, I am less likely to revolt. The same can be said for students under scholarships, or employed by it. It is a terrible place to conduct one’s study and I would not recommend it to my worst enemy. Below are some of the articles written that convey the previous facts: particularly the latest developments regarding the ongoing movement; No more silencing students.
I studied Health Promotion & Environmental Health Education at the University of Ilorin, and the journey was both enlightening and character-building. Each session came with fresh and impactful learning, and the program gave me the opportunity to connect classroom knowledge with real-life health challenges. One of the most eye-opening courses I took was Legal Health. It deepened my understanding of the legal and ethical responsibilities of health educators and public health practitioners. It was an intense but necessary wake-up call about how public health, human rights, and the law are deeply connected. We also participated in health outreaches, awareness campaigns, and field work, which made the program very practical and community-oriented. These experiences helped me grow in confidence, communication, and problem-solving. The University of Ilorin is known for its strict discipline and zero tolerance for indecency and malpractice. The university lives up to its Latin motto: “Probitas Doctrina” – “Learning and Character.” This core value is reflected in both academic expectations and student conduct. The environment fosters focus, modesty, and personal responsibility. Campus life was calm, structured, and secure, making it easy to focus on academics. Living in the hostel gave me a chance to experience independence, build meaningful friendships, and develop strong time management skills. Though hostel life came with its challenges, it taught me resilience, resourcefulness, and how to live peacefully with people from diverse backgrounds. If you’re looking for a program that combines public health, education, real-world experience, and strong values, this course and university will give you a solid foundation.
Nothing to show
