Escola Politécnica da Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP vs Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas - FMU vs Fundação Armando Álvares Penteado - FAAP vs Faculdade Santa Marcelina - FASM vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Faculdade Santa Marcelina - FASM (5.00)
Escola Politécnica da Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP: wins 1/7 categories
Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas - FMU: wins 1/7 categories
Fundação Armando Álvares Penteado - FAAP: wins 0/7 categories
Faculdade Santa Marcelina - FASM: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 5/7 categories
Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Citizen-Centered Digital Health and Social Care
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.40
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.40
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
2.80
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.50
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.60
Win
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic foundation and knowledgeable professors
  • +Supportive and welcoming community with engaging learning
  • +Excellent campus resources and student life
  • +High quality faculty and excellent teaching
  • +Convenient location and safety
  • +Scholarship and alumni discount programs

Nothing to show

  • +World-class fashion education and facilities
  • +Practical application of ideas
  • +Recognition and international level of teaching
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Pervasive, politically charged atmosphere disrupts academic focus.
  • -Lack of practical learning opportunities and rescheduled experiences.
  • -Insufficient or outdated facilities impacting the educational experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university excels in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.4. Student life and value are also strong points, with scores of 3.5 and 3.6 respectively. Conversely, the university's **internationality** is its weakest area, scoring a lower 2.8. Facilities and accommodation also received moderate scores, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

This institution garners solid scores in several key aspects. Its location is a standout strength, while facilities and professors also receive favorable ratings. Student life and value for money are areas with room for improvement. Accommodation and internationality are the weakest points, suggesting opportunities for enhancement in these domains.

Nothing to show

This university presents a uniform performance across all evaluated aspects, with no discernible strengths or weaknesses. All categories, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, received identical ratings. This suggests a consistent, albeit undeveloped, offering in every surveyed area.

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most feedback is positive (~57%), highlighting a supportive environment and knowledgeable professors. A small portion of reviews (~14%) expresses concerns about activism. The average rating is 3.71/5.

University feedback is mixed, with a ~25% of reviews expressing dissatisfaction. Positive feedback highlights respected faculty and good facilities, while negative comments focus on a lack of rescheduled lab classes and field trips.

Nothing to show

The sole review is highly positive, awarding 5 stars. This feedback highlights the college's excellent facilities and international-level fashion education, strongly recommending it. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
29%
25%
0%
100%
50%
0%
0%
4★
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
29%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
14%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close